[sugar] Cairo tile engine, and accessing 565 buffers from cairo and C
Mon Apr 16 13:47:22 EDT 2007
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:30:55 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:10 -0700, Don Hopkins wrote:
> > I've read on the mailing list that Cairo supports 565 ("begrudgingly",
> > whatever that implies).
> It means that cairo supports 565 only as a compatibility option, but
> will _not_ allow you to create new surfaces as 565. Basically, if you
> hand it a surface or pixel data that is in 565 format, it can use that
> data. But you cannot create 565 surfaces manually. Cairo's native
> format is 32 bit RGB with alpha.
I don't know where these rumors got started, but there's a bunch of
misinformation in the above. Apparently I've done a poor job of
explaining things somewhere, so I'm hoping I can straighten some of it
Here are some facts about cairo and the support it has for X visuals
of various depths and image formats of various depths.
First, understand that cairo provides different backends that allow
the user to explicitly create a surface with one backend or
another. Cairo also provides a way to create what it calls a "similar"
surface, where the application does not explicitly select the backend
surface type, but just passes an existing surface and asks cairo to
create a surface of the most suitable type.
I think the two cairo backends of interest in the current discussion
are the "xlib" and "image" backends. The xlib backend is used for
drawing to an X11 Drawable (a Window or Pixmap). The image backend is
used for drawing to a buffer of data in the application's memory
space. I'll discuss the capabilities of each, and then the issues of
using the "create_similar" interface.
For the xlib backend, if you have the X Render extension in your X
server, then you can use cairo to draw to an X11 Drawable of any depth
supported by the X server. You can do this by passing either an
XRenderPictFormat or a Visual describing the desired depth to one of
the following functions:
So, on the OLPC, where you definitely have a server that supports the
Render extension, you should have no problem using cairo to draw to an
X11 Drawable with a 565 format.
(Note: There are known bugs in cairo in drawing to an X server without
the Render extension and targeting an xlib surface with a format that
does not also exist as a supported format in the image backend. These
bugs should not affect OLPC as the Render extension should be present
in the X server. And, we are working to eliminate these bugs before
cairo 1.6 is released.)
The image backend (cairo_image_surface_create) is used when the
application wants to read/write to a buffer of data directly as well
as drawing to it with cairo. If this isn't the case, this backend
really should not be selected by the application.
The image backend does currently support only a very limited set of
formats, (ARGB32 and RGB24), both of which are 32-bits-per-pixel
It's conceptually possible to extend the list of formats supported by
the image backend, but not very appealing until we have something
besides humans to generate the combinatorial explosion of code needed
to handle each format.
In the meantime, if you are really concerned about the performance
when targeting an xlib surface, then you should really be using xlib
surfaces for your source data, not image surfaces.
In addition to the cairo_<backend>_surface_create functions discussed
above which involve the application explicitly selecting a backend to
use, cairo provides one additional interface:
With this interface, the application is not selecting the backend to
use, but instead cairo will select one for the application to best
meet its needs. The user expresses these needs by passing both an
existing surface and a description of the kind of "content" that the
new surface will hold, (whether color only, alpha only, or both color
and alpha). And cairo does the best it can to meet these needs.
I haven't seen details of the code that is being worked with here, but
I'm guessing that if 32-bit image surfaces are being generated in
undesirable situations, it might be through this interface. I'm
guessing that based on a statement such as:
> > But the surfaces it's handing my C code are 32 bit (RGB or ARGB).
That doesn't sound like somebody directly passed CAIRO_FORMAT_ARGB32
or CAIRO_FORMAT_RGB24 to cairo_image_surface_create, (in which case
the result wouldn't be surprising).
So, let's imagine the user has an X11 Drawable with a 565 visual, and
has done cairo_xlib_surface_create to create a surface named "target"
from that. Then, let's imagine the user wants to create an
intermediate surface that will be used as a source to draw to this
If the user does not need to store any alpha content to the surface,
then the user would call:
source = cairo_surface_create_similar (target,
And in this case, I fully expect cairo to return a new xlib surface
based on a Drawable with a 565 visual. If you're seeing anything else
in a situation like this, please let me know so that we can fix it
Now, if the user actually needs to store alpha and color to the source
surface, the user would call:
source = cairo_surface_create_similar (target,
And what should happen in this case?
More information about the Sugar-devel