[sugar] RFC: activity bundles
Marco Pesenti Gritti
mpg
Sat Sep 2 05:55:49 EDT 2006
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> Maybe id should actually be type_id to avoid confusion with the
>> actual activity (unique per each instance).
>>
>
> Or we could leave this id in the bundle info and have something like
> get_bundle_id in the activity api.
In the registry api itself we should probably use bundle rather than
activity which is ambiguous.
Marco
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list