[sugar] "Garden": A (currently hypothetical) Sugar library for sharing state between Activity participants

Andrew Clunis orospakr
Tue Nov 28 14:37:59 EST 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:14:29AM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> 
> Nope, or not necessarily. Right now every "kind" of activity has his own 
> process but all the activity instances are runned in the same process. 
> For example all web activities are run in the same process.

That's really unfortunate.  That makes the threat model a bit more
complicated.  What's the reason for this?  Memory conservation?
> 
> It's possible that this will change in the future but I don't think we 
> can/will force all activity instances to run in a separate process, so 
> the issue has to be considered.
> 
> Marco
>
- --
Regards,
Andrew Clunis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFbJAUALkUMXSNow8RAkVTAJwIaKzYZK0o8TmXK5Ze3LA77T4ANACgntWB
KZ4HGvjACB1PEnwfCVcHDcQ=
=IyqA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list