<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Douglas McClendon <<a href="mailto:dmc.sugar@filteredperception.org">dmc.sugar@filteredperception.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">On 01/27/2010 06:32 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> > - Can be easily booted on all Virtualisation solutions > (KVM/Zen/VMWare/Virtualbox/Fusion/Hyper-V etc) with no changes as they > all support booting off a CD iso image (your proposal would need the > VM drivers for at least storage to work properly for all of them) They also all support booting off a hard drive image, right? Which is what we'd do. Yes, but no. The support booting of their own proprietary images so you'd have to produce a separate image for each type of VM technology you wish to use and then ensure you have the drivers included in the kernel as well. In most cases you need non open tools to be able to produce these images as well. Hence the reason that the easiest way to support all VMs is to use a .iso image and let the user use liveinst to install to the VM technology of their choice. It gets even more complex </blockquote> </div> Peter, It seems Bernie brought up the fact that despite zyx-liveinstaller being prominently featured on the blueberry download page, that people like him still aren't getting the message that it exists in blueberry, and already provides the functionality you attribute to liveinst, which is not in blueberry, but may be in future releases. Can you please do the community the favor of mentioning zyx-liveinstaller as an existing, supported, featured, alternative the possible future use of liveinst? Or if you have some technical criticism of zyx-liveinstaller that merits its absense from your discussions, please explain it to me. </blockquote><div> I have no experience of zyx-liveinstaller and hence the reason I haven't mentioned it. If I've not used it I won't venture an opinion. Nothing sinister. liveinst is part of anaconda and hence what is used by Fedora upstream. With SoaS-3 becoming an official Fedora spin we're required to include it there and hence my mention of it. Regards, Peter </div> </div>