<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:05, Sebastian Dziallas <<a href="mailto:sebastian@when.com">sebastian@when.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I am herewith proposing the following changes to the section 5a. This has been derived from Fedora's trademark guidelines [1] and might need to be adjusted to cover more cases, as listed in those guidelines. By referring to Sugar on a Stick, the following draft means the project located [2] and hosted [3] here. - You *may* use the term "Sugar on a Stick" whenever referring to the official Sugar on a Stick product and its releases, as well as when distributing unmodified copies of it. -- However, this usage *must not* imply any endorsement by Sugar Labs or the Sugar on a Stick project, unless this is case and an appropriate agreement has been reached. - You *may* modify Sugar on a Stick and create remixes of it. -- However, when distributing or selling this modified version, you *must not* call it Sugar on a Stick. -- When not exposing the resulting product to the public, you *may* still call it Sugar on a Stick, though. A deployment might adjust Sugar on a Stick for its needs and still say it deployed Sugar on a Stick, as long as the modified version is not distributed publicly. </blockquote><div> +1 on all of the above. I believe that this is a reasonable addition, and that this will still allow third party developers to make products that synergize with the Sugar Labs ecosystem. </div></div>-- Luke Faraone <a href="http://luke.faraone.cc">http://luke.faraone.cc</a>