[SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

[Peter Robinson]

Hey James,

Happy New Year!

> > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and
> > > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities
> > > > >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here.
> > > > >> Are there any plans to move them to gst1?
> > > > >
> > > > > They were moved.  Check the release announcements and the tarball
> > > > > directories.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Clock/Clock-20.tar.bz2
> > > >
> > > > Ha, already have that, will review packaging and make sure it's all right.
> > > >
> > > > > http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Record/Record-200.tar.bz2
> > > >
> > > > Awesome! This makes me happy, thanks!
> > > >
> > > > >> 2) GTK2 sugar-toolkit, again a number of Activities still haven't
> > > > >> moved to gtk3, any plans?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes.  We have a contributor working on that now, so please make sure
> > > > > we know which ones Fedora think are still GTK+ 2.  Time critical.
> > > > >
> > > > >> 3) eToys, we've not shipped this by default for some time, I plan on
> > > > >> retiring it and any of it's dependencies in Fedora 29. Good riddance
> > > > >> sugar-presence-service!
> > > > >
> > > > > I've no news on this one.  Best to contact Etoys project.
> > > >
> > > > They stopped responding years ago, they never even got around to
> > > > removing the presence-server dep. I've retired it now.
> > > >
> > > > >> 4) This is the big one... python2. With python2 being EOL real soon
> > > > >> now is there any interest in moving to py3, I know there was some work
> > > > >> years ago to do some readiness here with the move to gtk3 but I don't
> > > > >> remember the details. Fedora is actively moving to python3 and has
> > > > >> been for some years, I think for at least 6 releases it's been
> > > > >> possible to run without py2 installed at all. Is this the nail in the
> > > > >> coffin for Sugar?
> > > > >
> > > > > Our port to Python 3 is going well.  We have good working code in pull
> > > > > requests and branches, and plan to merge it once we have the critical
> > > > > components complete.  Our plan is in the GitHub projects tab for the
> > > > > organisation.
> > > >
> > > > Awesome news! Is there a rough timeline for this?
> > >
> > > Following last year's release plan; a v0.113 around 9th September, and
> > > a v0.114 around 6th October.
> >
> > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to
> > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than
> > later.
>
> Stalled on sugar-toolkit-gtk3 port from static to PyGObject
> introspection for Telepathy.
>
> There's still no Python 3 support for the static binding in the
> Telepathy project, though the binding has been ported to Python 3 by
> our developer Rahul.  So porting to PyGObject seems like the right way
> to go.  It is in progress.  PRs #389 and #383.
>
> With only myself and Rahul looking at this, I'd guess another few
> months before a release with Python 3 support.  I'll put it down for
> discussion at the weekly meeting.

Just thought I'd do a check in to see how you're getting on with the
python3 port, just trying to do a bit of planning for the next few
months.

I updated all the various Activities to the latest versions the other
day, except I couldn't find the latest version of TurtleBlocks, on the
download site the latest is 216 and I couldn't find it in git.

Peter