[SoaS] The plan moving forward for SoaS with Fedora 31 and Fedora 32

[Thomas Gilliard]

irc #fedora-arm

<satellit_> testing Fedora-SoaS-armhfp-Rawhide-20190829.n.0-sda.raw    
thanks all
<satellit_> will not login...both raw and .iso
......

<jlinton> graphical login, or the text prompt?
<satellit_> graphical target    works in f5 tty
* satellit_ .iso
<satellit_> liveuser fails to start
<jlinton> Ok, I was wondering if I should be seeing similar, but sounds 
like just running the server/tty is working
......
<satellit_> arm does i-s but fails to login to root or user
<satellit_> only mediawriter usb for live boot
<satellit_> bios pc/rpiB3+
......
<pbrobinson> satellit_: it's an issue with gwebsockets. I've let the 
sugar people know
<satellit_> thanks

On 8/29/19 8:41 AM, Alex Perez wrote:
> Forwarding an abridged version of Peter's response to the SoaS ML for 
> completeness, and so we can continue the conversation there.
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Packages in Fedora
> Date: 	Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:02:59 +0100
> From: 	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> To: 	Alex Perez <aperez at alexperez.com>
>
> Hi Alex,
> > Thanks for reaching out. I am working on Telepathy-salut and
> > telepathy-gabble buildability tomorrow evening.
>
> Reach out on IRC or email if you need help there.
>
> With this update I think we're over the line for Beta and hence out of
> the woods for the moment.
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-dd8c4e8c66
>
> If you could test and provide karma on it that would be great, it's
> basically approved as a freeze exception so once that is ACKed we
> should have images. I also updated to the 0.114 release as part of
> that update.
>
> F-31 has branched off Rawhide now and I
> think we get that working as a compose, which should happen in the
> next day or so. It has 0.114 so we test and basically call that one
> done.
>
> Rawhide is open now for F-32 development for a May release next year
> and we aim that one for python3. We have working images as of today
> for that with basically the same contents as F-31.
>
> The following bug has all the other python2 bugs attached to it so I'm
> using it as a general tracker:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737929
>
> The way I see it what we need to do is as follows:
>
> 1) Move as many Activities over sugar-toolkit-gtk3 as possible, kill
> off the rest and retire sugar-toolkit (and I think we can retire
> sugar-base then too). See details below around some of this below.
> There was a thread a number of months ago where a bunch of these were
> discussed. There doesn't appear to have been much movement, some just
> need a release tagged.
>
> 2)  Build a version of sugar-toolkit-gtk3 that supports both python2
> and python3 Basically sugar-activity3. I believe this should actually
> be possible with 0.114 to some degree but a new release would likely
> be better. This allows Activities move over independently. Once the
> migration is complete we disable the python2 build.
>
> 3) Move the core sugar UX to python3. I believe we should be able
> sugar UX and datastore over independently as I believe the Activities
> communicate with the later via dbus.
>
> What have I missed, what are your thoughts?
>
> >  From what I can see at
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/Schedule  we have less than
> > two weeks until the desired initial beta release date.
>
> Correct, but we're currently in freeze which means all changes have to
> fix bugs and go through QA approval process.
>
>
> Status of Activities still reliant on GTK2 based sugar-toolkit:
> sugar-castle - no idea
> sugar-connect - no idea
> sugar-countries - appears to have been ported to GTK3 but no release
> sugar-deducto - appears to have been ported to GTK3 but no release
> sugar-flipsticks - no movement of note
> sugar-kuku - no idea
> sugar-labyrinth - not sure
> sugar-playgo - some movement not idea if gtk3
> sugar-srilanka - no idea
> sugar-starchart - nothing recent except translations
> sugar-view-slides - recent work, maybe gtk3, no release
> sugar-xomail - no idea
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SoaS mailing list
> SoaS at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/attachments/20190829/70676c39/attachment.html>