[SoaS] [Sugar-devel] Defining "sugar HEAD".

[Thomas C Gilliard]

I have been testing applications in 4 GB Soas Live USB's created, with 
persistence, with a script:

./livecd-iso-to-disk  --format --reset-mbr --overlay-size-mb 1200 
xxxx.iso /dev/sdb*

SUGAR VERSIONS:
1-Mirabelle o.88.0
2-Nightly Composes f14 -rawhide 0.88.1

I have tested applications in these forms

1-    supplied on the Soas.iso
1a - CP Software updates
2-    yum install sugar*  (.rpms)
       a 41 file install
3-   run from a 2nd USB holding 140+ applications from ASLO. (.xo)

The results are entered in an Ooo Spreadsheet and uploaded to Tgillard

http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/Activities-Index-ASLO-f13-Mirabelle-f14-rawhide-Soas-tests.ods

Where should these tests (which list) be reported and how?
    I am presently announcing on [soas] when there is an update.

* Note there is also an older Ooo ss that covers strawberry/blueberry 
releases on Tgilliard

I am not sure iwhere these tests fit in with your listing.

Cordially;

Tom Gilliard
satellit
on freenode #sugar

Michael Stone wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We've done some good work in the past few weeks getting the Sugar patch
> generation and review processes unstuck. Interesting new patches are now being
> published and reviewed with some frequency, which is great. 
>
> (Particular thanks are due to James, Bernie, and Tomeu for their work reviewing
> patches and bringing patches to sugar-devel@ for review.)
>
> However, in order for us to be able to make an awesome release in a couple of
> months, we need to get the merge and testing processes unstuck too.
>
> What do you think of these suggestions on how to approach these issues?
>
>    1. Can we get better at gently nudging people to review or to merge patches
>       that have been overlooked so that fewer patches slip by into limbo? 
>
>    2. Can we define a single "sugar HEAD", updated on a weekly basis, which
>       folks can test on whichever [1] platform they like best? 
>
>    3. Can we start organizing the creation and publishing of test results for
>       whatever "sugar HEAD" turns out to be, much like we did for "Friends in
>       Testing" for OLPC? 
>
> Regards, and thanks in advance for your thoughts,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> [1]: Platforms that I know people like testing on so far include:
>
>          * jhbuild
>          * XO-1's
>          * XO-1.5's
>          * SoaS
>          * normal distros
>          * distro chroots
>          * iPads
>          * LTSP?
>          * <your platform here>
>
> Did I miss anyone?
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>