[SoaS] Requesting an extension for SoaS feature freeze for 4 features

[Sebastian Dziallas]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:16 AM, pbrobinson at gmail.com
<pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Mel Chua <mel at melchua.com> wrote:
>> Since feature freeze is today but I'm about to spiral into
>> unconsciousness, I'm requesting an extension for edits to the
>> following 4 feature proposals being submitted for review
>> (http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick_release_process#Features_submitted_for_review):
>>
>> * Updated Activities from the Mirabelle list - this should be
>> straightforward to write up, but all the parts of the template need
>> filling-in. (Basically, we that continue to ship all the Activities we
>> shipped in Mirabelle, but make sure the code that's shipped is updated
>> to the latest version.)
>> * Including Fructose Activities that are tested and known to work -
>> similar to above.
>> * Remixability - already written up by Tom and discussed on this list,
>> I think this needs a bit more consensus and finalizing before it's
>> +1'd and would like to do that relatively quickly; the technical
>> functionality for this has been working for a long time, but we have
>> not done a strong marketing push for it yet.
>> * More robust iso - we now have a gameplan for it that's reflected on
>> the ticket, but it needs to be pulled into the feature proposal
>> itself.
>>
>> I'll be doing this first thing when I wake up in the morning, so
>> they'll only be a few hours late - I've been swamped with family stuff
>> since Monday's meeting when we last discussed these, and didn't want
>> to block others from working on the feature proposals (nor surprise
>> people by showing up with these several hours late).
>
> Let's extend it out to then end of the week (or maybe even until next
> Monday at the SoaS meeting) but only for the above 4 proposals. The
> contents of the above proposals has been long established and known so
> its not a last minute suprise and there's been ongoing work on most of
> them since even before SoaS-3 was released.
>
> Can I possibly add one more to this? Samy has provided me some good
> links so I'm going to attempt to write up the EU language feature over
> the weekend that has also been discussed.
>
>> Apologies for the delay,
>
> Absolutely no need!
>
> Peter

Totally +1 on all of this. Makes perfectly sense to me to extent this
a little for these. Thanks for working on this!

--Sebastian