Goals look good: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors#Fedora_Ambassadors_Goals">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors#Fedora_Ambassadors_Goals</a><br><br>Can we call it Sugar Facilitators?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:21 PM, David Farning <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dfarning@sugarlabs.org">dfarning@sugarlabs.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Sean DALY<<a href="http://sdaly.be" target="_blank">sdaly.be</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I'm confused, is the idea that "Ambassadors" try to recruit<br>
> developers, and Sugar Labs contributors who talk to teachers be called<br>
> something else?<br>
><br>
> I vastly prefer "Facilitators", but that's because I don't share the<br>
> view that it's a higher priority for us to reach out to FOSS<br>
> developers than to reach out to teachers, and I daresay teachers need<br>
> much more explaining of what Sugar is designed to do than developers<br>
> will.<br>
><br>
> I think we agree that Sugar needs teacher buy-in for its success. We<br>
> need teachers challenging our concepts, offering their experience and<br>
> intuition, and identifying barriers (technical and otherwise) to Sugar<br>
> adoption.<br>
><br>
> Of course we should be present at FOSS conventions. Of course we<br>
> should communicate to developers our passion and ideals about<br>
> bettering educational opportunity for millions of children.<br>
><br>
> But, we're already good at that. What we're not good at yet is<br>
> confronting our ideas with classroom realities. There is a vast amount<br>
> of teacher savoir-faire out in the world about making learning happen<br>
> with Sugar, but we can't access any of it since there is no feedback<br>
> loop. I believe we should be better empowering teachers within Sugar<br>
> itself, but I have no data yet to support that position without<br>
> feedback.<br>
><br>
> Actually, what I'd like is for Sugar Facilitators not just to go to<br>
> conventions (although we certainly should). What I'd like is to start<br>
> a tradition of visiting schools. You know, like the sales forces of<br>
> publishers, service providers, systems integrators, computer<br>
> manufacturers, and proprietary software firms do. We have an<br>
> unbeatable sales pitch compared to the others: we have nothing to sell<br>
> except ideas; we do this to improve education; we are looking for<br>
> information, and here is Sugar on a Stick for you to try out.<br>
><br>
> In my view, fact-finding trips to schools could just be the best way<br>
> to quickly find technically adept teachers willing to share with us.<br>
> And, if we are organized about our visit reporting, we could become<br>
> much better at seeing what is going on in schools in a consolidated<br>
> way; shifts from computer labs to 1:1 computing for example, or<br>
> attitudes about the Internet, or things that work really well or not<br>
> at all.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Please take a step back and look at the _goals_ of the Fedora<br>
Ambassadors program as it applies to the overall goals of the Fedora<br>
project. Then think of how a similar project might be adapted to to<br>
the overall goals of Sugar Labs.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
david<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
> thanks<br>
><br>
> Sean<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Caroline<br>
> Meeks<<a href="mailto:caroline@solutiongrove.com">caroline@solutiongrove.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> hmm, how about a link to the facilitation wiki that Gunner showed us.:<br>
>> <a href="http://facilitation.aspirationtech.org/index.php/Agenda:Index" target="_blank">http://facilitation.aspirationtech.org/index.php/Agenda:Index</a><br>
>><br>
>> Also, is it to late to not use the word Ambassadors. Its a power, fear and<br>
>> hierarchical filled metaphor that I think will feed into teachers existing<br>
>> feelings of alienation in regards to technology.<br>
>><br>
>> I know we didn't come up with anything better.<br>
>><br>
>> So my suggestion is "Sugar Facilitators" teachers and schools use the word<br>
>> facilitation frequently, I think it will be more comfortable for them..<br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM, David Farning <<a href="mailto:dfarning@sugarlabs.org">dfarning@sugarlabs.org</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> We now have a draft wiki page on how to organize an event at<br>
>>> <a href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Organizing_an_Event" target="_blank">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Organizing_an_Event</a> .<br>
>>><br>
>>> I'll try to gather up the materials we have used in previous events so<br>
>>> we can find them again next time. Please fell free to add and correct<br>
>>> as necessary.<br>
>>><br>
>>> david<br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> Marketing mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org">Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Caroline Meeks<br>
>> Solution Grove<br>
>> Caroline@SolutionGrove.com<br>
>><br>
>> 617-500-3488 - Office<br>
>> 505-213-3268 - Fax<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Marketing mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org">Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Caroline Meeks<br>Solution Grove<br>Caroline@SolutionGrove.com<br><br>617-500-3488 - Office<br>505-213-3268 - Fax<br>