[Marketing] PDF for Sugar documentation
Ryan Cunningham
rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 15 19:47:14 EST 2013
I have made some more edits; including removing the "overfull \hbox" in the resources table, and removing the reference to constructivism.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar_mono.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 42165 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131115/c5a9732d/attachment-0004.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar_mono.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 67501 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131115/c5a9732d/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar_mono.tex
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 9616 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131115/c5a9732d/attachment-0005.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 42110 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131115/c5a9732d/attachment-0006.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 67603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131115/c5a9732d/attachment-0003.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar.tex
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 10007 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131115/c5a9732d/attachment-0007.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
On Nov 10, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have made some more edits:
>
> In section 2, "Getting to Know Sugar": Deleted "``Done.''" and replaced with "``Done''."
>
> The period/quotation mark pair is punctuated in the correction as it is punctuated elsewhere in the document.
>
> The corrected versions are supplied as follows.
>
> <sugar_mono.log><sugar_mono.pdf><sugar_mono.tex><sugar.log><sugar.pdf><sugar.tex>
> --
> Ryan Cunningham
>
> On Nov 10, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you. I have made a few edits of my own, including adding an abstract; and, instead of deleting the "GIMP Toolkit" name, I just added a footnote after it stating it was outdated.
>>
>> Some of the information you added was put into a new sub-subsection; and I have also added a credit line containing your name ("Edited by Walter Bender, Sugar Labs Marketing").
>>
>> A grayscale version is provided in case the user's printing limitations require.
>>
>> <sugar_mono.pdf><sugar_mono.tex><sugar.pdf><sugar.tex>
>> On Nov 10, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I put my comments inline <-- COMMENT -->
>>>
>>> regards.
>>>
>>> -walter
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Can do. But it seems you are setting a rather high bar for feedback.
>>>>
>>>> -walter
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I would like to receive these edits in the form of a unified diff between the original LaTeX file and the new LaTeX file.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you don't know how to create a unified diff, type
>>>>>
>>>>> diff -Naur <file1> <file2>
>>>>>
>>>>> at a terminal prompt.
>>>>>
>>>>> You should have good experience at typesetting with LaTeX2e before you make these edits.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ryan Cunningham
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ryan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for writing this. I have a few suggested edits. How would you
>>>>>> like to receive them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -walter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To the members of the list:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to send proposed documentation for Sugar to this list. The
>>>>>>>> documentation is attached to this message in the PDF format, and should be
>>>>>>>> forwarded to the Documentation Team.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The documentation was written using XeLaTeX, with the DejaVu Sans and
>>>>>>>> DejaVu Sans Mono fonts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ryan Cunningham
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPod
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry... I had some mistakes to correct, including sending you the source
>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ryan Cunningham
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Marketing mailing list
>>>>>>> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Walter Bender
>>>>>> Sugar Labs
>>>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Walter Bender
>>>> Sugar Labs
>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Walter Bender
>>> Sugar Labs
>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>> <feedback.patch>
>>
>
More information about the Marketing
mailing list