[Marketing] PDF for Sugar documentation

[Ryan Cunningham]

Thank you. I have made a few edits of my own, including adding an abstract; and, instead of deleting the "GIMP Toolkit" name, I just added a footnote after it stating it was outdated.

Some of the information you added was put into a new sub-subsection; and I have also added a credit line containing your name ("Edited by Walter Bender, Sugar Labs Marketing").

A grayscale version is provided in case the user's printing limitations require.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar_mono.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 67641 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131110/dd2868a1/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar_mono.tex
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 9690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131110/dd2868a1/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 67752 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131110/dd2868a1/attachment-0003.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sugar.tex
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 10081 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131110/dd2868a1/attachment-0003.obj>
-------------- next part --------------

On Nov 10, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:

> I put my comments inline <-- COMMENT -->
> 
> regards.
> 
> -walter
> 
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can do. But it seems you are setting a rather high bar for feedback.
>> 
>> -walter
>> 
>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I would like to receive these edits in the form of a unified diff between the original LaTeX file and the new LaTeX file.
>>> 
>>> If you don't know how to create a unified diff, type
>>> 
>>>  diff -Naur <file1> <file2>
>>> 
>>> at a terminal prompt.
>>> 
>>> You should have good experience at typesetting with LaTeX2e before you make these edits.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Ryan Cunningham
>>> 
>>> On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Ryan,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for writing this. I have a few suggested edits. How would you
>>>> like to receive them?
>>>> 
>>>> regards.
>>>> 
>>>> -walter
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Ryan Cunningham <rvskmbrly3 at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To the members of the list:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would like to send proposed documentation for Sugar to this list. The
>>>>>> documentation is attached to this message in the PDF format, and should be
>>>>>> forwarded to the Documentation Team.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The documentation was written using XeLaTeX, with the DejaVu Sans and
>>>>>> DejaVu Sans Mono fonts.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ryan Cunningham
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent from my iPod
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry... I had some mistakes to correct, including sending you the source
>>>>> code.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ryan Cunningham
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Marketing mailing list
>>>>> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Walter Bender
>>>> Sugar Labs
>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> <feedback.patch>