[Marketing] [Sugar-devel] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0[ Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 43]

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Sean,
Usually, we are not doing big changes, but incremental changes.
We are closer to the reality of the linux kernel, where the change to 3.0
was not related to changes itself, but to the numbers where not comfortable,
and they are planning release version 4.0 by the same reason in one year.

What you think about using years as versions (2013.1 2013.2 or 13.1, 13.2)
as a way to try incentive to the deployments and the final users
to be updated?

Gonzalo

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sean DALY <sdaly.be at gmail.com> wrote:
> cc'ing marketing for... a marketing issue
>
> Nope, the GTK3 change just passed under the radar. As stated previously I
> lobbied for a v1 six years ago which is why we are ready for a v2. Or even a
> v3.
>
> For building a PR story I can work with v2 or v3, just not v1.
>
> The issue with 2.2, 2.4 is that from a marketing perspective we get boxed
> into a major number step timeframe irrespective of marketing needs. A major
> number change should ideally happen when it's ready, or when we need to
> communicate a major shift. I still think associating the existing numbering
> behind a major number (e.g. 2.102) keeps continuity. PR will communicate the
> major number, probably with a name. And not an unmarketable obscure name,
> either.
>
> Sean
> Sugar Labs Marketing Coordinator
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm I suppose the 1.x -> 2.x switch would have not made sense to marketing
>> because there wasn't major user visible changes?
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For sugar developers their is certainly a continuation in development and
>>> the current numbering makes a lot of sense.
>>> However, looking from outside 0.102 should be Sugar 3.x where  1.x is the
>>> original, 2.x is the Gtk3/introspection move and now the html5/jc
>>> (online/ultrabook/tablet) version.
>>> If you actually consider 0.100 as 3.0 then it can go 3.2, 3.4 etc to keep
>>> up with current numbering.
>>> Should make marketing happy with minimal disruption.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Narvaez
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>