[Marketing] [Sugar-devel] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0[ Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 43]

[Sean DALY]

cc'ing marketing for... a marketing issue

Nope, the GTK3 change just passed under the radar. As stated previously I
lobbied for a v1 six years ago which is why we are ready for a v2. Or even
a v3.

For building a PR story I can work with v2 or v3, just not v1.

The issue with 2.2, 2.4 is that from a marketing perspective we get boxed
into a major number step timeframe irrespective of marketing needs. A major
number change should ideally happen when it's ready, or when we need to
communicate a major shift. I still think associating the existing numbering
behind a major number (e.g. 2.102) keeps continuity. PR will communicate
the major number, probably with a name. And not an unmarketable obscure
name, either.

Sean
Sugar Labs Marketing Coordinator




On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm I suppose the 1.x -> 2.x switch would have not made sense to marketing
> because there wasn't major user visible changes?
>
>
> On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> For sugar developers their is certainly a continuation in development and
>> the current numbering makes a lot of sense.
>> However, looking from outside 0.102 should be Sugar 3.x where  1.x is the
>> original, 2.x is the Gtk3/introspection move and now the html5/jc
>> (online/ultrabook/tablet) version.
>> If you actually consider 0.100 as 3.0 then it can go 3.2, 3.4 etc to keep
>> up with current numbering.
>> Should make marketing happy with minimal disruption.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131107/463accaa/attachment.html>