[Marketing] [IAEP] [Sur] Sugar oversight board meeting

[Thomas Gilliard]

On 11/4/2013 4:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 4 November 2013 23:05, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com 
> <mailto:pbrobinson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Sugar on Android or the Raspberry Pi might have an interesting
>     marketing effect but the result would be truly terrible as it would be
>     essentially unusable and have a terrible experience.
>
>
> Can you elaborate on why you think it would be a terrible experience 
> on the Raspberry Pi? I never tested it there, I was just hoping it 
> could be a nice target...
Look at these older tests of sugar on the RPi:
    http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Testing/Reports/ARM_RPi

This part of the Advanced topics wiki page on the sugarlabs wiki:
  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Advanced_Topics#ARM

Tom Gilliard
satellit on #sugar ; #fedora-arm ; #fedora-qa ; and #schoolserver on 
freenode irc


>     There are a
>     number of other ARM devices that sugar runs beautifully on though.
>
>
> It would also be interesting to know more about these devices. With 
> OLPC going the Android way, I wish there was at least one popular 
> enough device on which we could provide a really good experience (with 
> our scarce resources).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20131104/8ae5818b/attachment-0001.html>