[Marketing] [SoaS] updating the draft decision panel report

[Sean DALY]

Martin - I've said before, numerous times, that other projects
shouldn't be called Sugar on a Stick or a variant thereof.

What's ouitside the scope is defining what anyone should call their
project when it's not called Sugar on a Stick or a variant thereof.

Perhaps I'm not expressing myself clearly, but I don't see a
contradiction between what you're saying and what I'm saying?

Sean


On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Martin Dengler <martin at martindengler.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Sean DALY wrote:
>> Again, this is a marketing discussion and in my view outside the scope
>> of the question.
>
> I don't mind what we call it but it's darn pertinent to the question:
> we cannot in good faith declare it best for the community to avoid
> something unless we know what consequences that has.
>
> Tabitha's main question has a simple answer:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Tabitha Roder <tabitha at hrdnz.com> wrote:
>> > Can I suggest we start talking about what method we recommend others
>> > use to define other Sugar on a USB naming conventions?
>
> answer: "anything not too close to 'Sugar on a Stick'.  For a
> definition of 'to close' that's more formal, our lawyers can talk to
> your lawyers.  Informally, just use common sense and we'll try to do
> so too."
>
> You're ignoring reality if you think that we don't need to discuss
> whether "SoaS" is off-limits, for example.  Is it?
>
>> Sean
>
> Martin
>