[Marketing] idea for consolidated Sugar feedback + a new name for our "users"
walter.bender at gmail.com
Tue May 26 07:40:03 EDT 2009
+1 to Learners.
Regarding your questions, let's go with three instead of two and let's
start with the positive:
* What do you like about Sugar?
* What concerns do you have about Sugar?
* How can we, the Sugar community, overcome these concerns?
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Sean DALY <sdaly.be at gmail.com> wrote:
> Gary C. Martin made an excellent observation: if we have "Activities"
> instead of "applications", shouldn't we have "Doers" instead of
> I fully agree we shouldn't have "users" of Sugar Activities. I like
> "Doers", but I think "Learners" may roll off the tongue more easily.
> Suggestions please.
> On a related subject: I want feedback from our Learners (Doers) using
> the XO-1. We've discussed this before, but following SugarCamp where
> we concluded with a round-robin of our 3-/3+ takeaways (what didn't
> work, what worked) I had an idea watching a survivor show on
> television... to set up a rope bridge, the hikers threw a small wire
> across the rapids, attached to a thicker rope which they then used to
> make a bridge with two other ropes. So my idea is to start with a
> two-line survey of our Learners around the world:
> * What do you not like about Sugar?
> * What do you like about Sugar?
> Short, simple, to the point... easy to translate... a light payload
> for the difficult task of distributing/receiving a survey :-)
> Can we start with this "wire", and work our way up to a "bridge"?
> Could we ask the OLPC Corps Africa people for help, in parallel with
> their formal survey? I have heard they will have one, but I have no
> info about it.
> ideas please
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Marketing