[Marketing] organizing an event
John Tierney
jtis4stx at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 22 16:09:21 EDT 2009
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:12:56 -0400
From: caroline at solutiongrove.com
To: dfarning at sugarlabs.org
CC: Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Marketing] organizing an event
Goals look good: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors#Fedora_Ambassadors_Goals
Can we call it Sugar Facilitators?
+1
Re: [Marketing] Being An Ambassador
From:
John Tierney (jtis4stx at hotmail.com)
Sent:
Mon 6/08/09 10:58 PM
To:
Mel Chua (mel at melchua.com)
Cc:
marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
"Sugar Facilitators" Program-Creating the Path to
Learning has never been so Sweet!
"Sugar Facilitation Station"-One stop shop for Sugar Branding templates-Business
cards, stickers, balloons, banners, etc. with hook into cafepress and/or other t-shirt/
printable Sugar swag.
JT
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:38:48 -040
> From: mel at melchua.com
> To: caroline at solutiongrove.com
> CC: marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Marketing] Being An Ambassador
>
> > Can anyone think of something we can call Sugar "Ambassadors" that is
> > friendly, youthful and egalitarian and will put teachers into a mindset
> > where they believe that by trying, experimenting and especially playing,
> > they can learn to use Sugar and use it to help their kids learn.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:21 PM, David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Sean DALY<sdaly.be at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm confused, is the idea that "Ambassadors" try to recruit
> developers, and Sugar Labs contributors who talk to teachers be called
> something else?
>
> I vastly prefer "Facilitators", but that's because I don't share the
> view that it's a higher priority for us to reach out to FOSS
> developers than to reach out to teachers, and I daresay teachers need
> much more explaining of what Sugar is designed to do than developers
> will.
>
> I think we agree that Sugar needs teacher buy-in for its success. We
> need teachers challenging our concepts, offering their experience and
> intuition, and identifying barriers (technical and otherwise) to Sugar
> adoption.
>
> Of course we should be present at FOSS conventions. Of course we
> should communicate to developers our passion and ideals about
> bettering educational opportunity for millions of children.
>
> But, we're already good at that. What we're not good at yet is
> confronting our ideas with classroom realities. There is a vast amount
> of teacher savoir-faire out in the world about making learning happen
> with Sugar, but we can't access any of it since there is no feedback
> loop. I believe we should be better empowering teachers within Sugar
> itself, but I have no data yet to support that position without
> feedback.
>
> Actually, what I'd like is for Sugar Facilitators not just to go to
> conventions (although we certainly should). What I'd like is to start
> a tradition of visiting schools. You know, like the sales forces of
> publishers, service providers, systems integrators, computer
> manufacturers, and proprietary software firms do. We have an
> unbeatable sales pitch compared to the others: we have nothing to sell
> except ideas; we do this to improve education; we are looking for
> information, and here is Sugar on a Stick for you to try out.
>
> In my view, fact-finding trips to schools could just be the best way
> to quickly find technically adept teachers willing to share with us.
> And, if we are organized about our visit reporting, we could become
> much better at seeing what is going on in schools in a consolidated
> way; shifts from computer labs to 1:1 computing for example, or
> attitudes about the Internet, or things that work really well or not
> at all.
Please take a step back and look at the _goals_ of the Fedora
Ambassadors program as it applies to the overall goals of the Fedora
project. Then think of how a similar project might be adapted to to
the overall goals of Sugar Labs.
david
> thanks
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Caroline
> Meeks<caroline at solutiongrove.com> wrote:
>> hmm, how about a link to the facilitation wiki that Gunner showed us.:
>> http://facilitation.aspirationtech.org/index.php/Agenda:Index
>>
>> Also, is it to late to not use the word Ambassadors. Its a power, fear and
>> hierarchical filled metaphor that I think will feed into teachers existing
>> feelings of alienation in regards to technology.
>>
>> I know we didn't come up with anything better.
>>
>> So my suggestion is "Sugar Facilitators" teachers and schools use the word
>> facilitation frequently, I think it will be more comfortable for them..
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM, David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We now have a draft wiki page on how to organize an event at
>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Organizing_an_Event .
>>>
>>> I'll try to gather up the materials we have used in previous events so
>>> we can find them again next time. Please fell free to add and correct
>>> as necessary.
>>>
>>> david
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Marketing mailing list
>>> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Caroline Meeks
>> Solution Grove
>> Caroline at SolutionGrove.com
>>
>> 617-500-3488 - Office
>> 505-213-3268 - Fax
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Marketing mailing list
>> Marketing at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>>
>>
>
--
Caroline Meeks
Solution Grove
Caroline at SolutionGrove.com
617-500-3488 - Office
505-213-3268 - Fax
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20090622/f22b4330/attachment.htm
More information about the Marketing
mailing list