<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I had asked that we discuss changes to our Code of Conduct in <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Conduct">a wiki
page</a> I have worked on, where I put the result of a lot of
research.</p>
<p>The time I spent, back in January, on this document, is because I
myself felt not only harassed but threatened. It came as a
realization then, that perhaps more people have had similar
experiences and have abandoned Sugar Labs because they were less
tenacious than others. Hopefully you'll find the references I put
there (beyond geek feminism) interesting. They represent a broad
spectrum of approaches to making a community more welcoming.<br>
</p>
<p>I found our <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Legal/Code_of_Conduct">current
Code of Conduct</a> was not sufficient because (1) it is vague
and difficult to evaluate when it's been infringed. Cultures vary
widely with regard to what is <i>considerate</i>, <i>respectful</i>,
<i>collaborative</i>, and <i>flexible</i>. It would be much
better if specific acceptable or not acceptable behaviors were
listed. (2) There is no defined procedure on how to report a
problem and what the expected outcome, timeline, or response could
be. (3) There's no defined solution or action such as warning or
temporarily moderating a person to signal bad behavior.</p>
<p>James, you insist on victimizing yourself and have a
confrontational form of writing. Perhaps I'm misreading you.
Please improve your tone. I have only seen vague complaints on the
alleged dispute (<i>"rate of posting and Wiki editing"</i>, and <i>"use
of many paths to achieve your goals"</i>).<br>
</p>
<p>If all of this is because I had the audacity to merge an icon, I
feel your attitude is disproportionate, unfair and itself
sufficient for a complaint. Trying to flag my github profile seems
particularly aggressive and harmful, considering the market use of
such profiles.<br>
</p>
<p>The trademarked icon has already been reinstated in master
branch, but my valid concern (that neither Sugar Labs nor
downstream distributors have permission to use it), has not been
resolved. I raised the same question openly in 2016, and <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2016-04-01T19:01:31#i_2864254">you
responded with sarcasm</a>. I don't think this is acceptable.<br>
</p>
<p>At the moment I don't support Laura's motion because I think it's
necessary to write something more specific for Sugar Labs, taking
into consideration the other references listed in the page at the
least.<br>
</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Sebastian<br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>