<div dir="auto"><div>Hi<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 19, 2017 11:19 AM, "Samson Goddy" <<a href="mailto:samsongoddy@gmail.com">samsongoddy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div class="quoted-text"><div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 18 Feb 2017 10:51 p.m., "Dave Crossland" <<a href="mailto:dave@lab6.com" target="_blank">dave@lab6.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="m_-8579558173783404749quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">Hi<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">There is no need to pay for ads because these as companies offer free credit to charities and libre projects like ours. </div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"></div></div><div dir="auto">Other than Google that gives ads credit worth $10k a month. I don't think facebook, twitter, instagram etc offers same. But if it true that would be nice.</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">You maybe right.... Eg <a href="https://nonprofits.fb.com">https://nonprofits.fb.com</a> is just training info.... </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="http://www.thenonprofittimes.com/news-articles/2-million-in-facebook-ads-going-to-nonprofits/">http://www.thenonprofittimes.com/news-articles/2-million-in-facebook-ads-going-to-nonprofits/</a> was a temporary thing for <br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="http://actionsprout.com/">http://actionsprout.com/</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div class="quoted-text"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="m_-8579558173783404749quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">As Caryl and Tony are discussing, the most basic things about the homepage can be improved. </div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"></div></div><div dir="auto">Was she talking about the homepage (website). There is a plan to redesign it at GSOC. I am also learning web development to further add more features to the site.</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Yes, I encourage you to review Tony's email about it :)</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div class="quoted-text"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="m_-8579558173783404749quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I don't think a push on SMM is needed; indeed I don't think a push on any marketing is needed, until the mission / vision / goals / objectives are clarified, so the next few years have a direction. Until then as Samson days it's going in circles, not growing. </div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"></div></div><div dir="auto">Yeah i agree to this statement too, clearly we need mission statement to clarify what our goals are and to really know what to market. Who is responsible for these??</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">We are waiting for Sameer. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div class="quoted-text"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="m_-8579558173783404749quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">I agree with Caryl about ditching the Python code base; let OLPC deal with it. <br></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"></div></div><div dir="auto">Caryl stated a good point too. I believe i mentioned it in the motion. Letting people to more about Sugarizer. Because i believe that where the future lies. But there is still nothing wrong with the python base. </div></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">There is now 1 real world deployment of sugarizer, thanks to efforts of the OLPC France community. This is a huge step from last year when I rejoined the community and there was not yet one. With that milestone now passed I think I would have recommended the font editor gsoc be done with js not Python. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div class="quoted-text"><div dir="auto"></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="m_-8579558173783404749quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><div class="m_-8579558173783404749elided-text"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 18, 2017 1:10 AM, "Samson Goddy" <<a href="mailto:samsongoddy@gmail.com" target="_blank">samsongoddy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="m_-8579558173783404749m_-7813496849137279788quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div>At the last meeting, i proposed a motion concerning funding the Social Media role, there where lot of questions asked. So this is the updated document, i think is something SL should really consider for the future of Sugar Labs. Below are the links of Social Media that already exist. <br><div><br><br> [1] <a href="https://www.facebook.com/SugarLabsforall/" target="_blank">https://www.facebook.com/Sugar<wbr>Labsforall/</a><br><br> [2] <a href="https://twitter.com/sugar_labs" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/sugar_labs</a><br><br> [3] <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/454719?trk=vsrp_companies_cluster_name&trkInfo=VSRPsearchId%3A1954828041487359711037%2CVSRPtargetId%3A454719%2CVSRPcmpt%3Acompanies_cluster" target="_blank">https://www.linkedin.com/compa<wbr>ny/454719?trk=vsrp_companies_c<wbr>luster_name&trkInfo=VSRPsearch<wbr>Id%3A1954828041487359711037%<wbr>2CVSRPtargetId%3A454719%<wbr>2CVSRPcmpt%3Acompanies_cluster</a><br><br> [4] <a href="https://www.instagram.com/sugarlabsforall/" target="_blank">https://www.instagram.com/suga<wbr>rlabsforall/</a><br></div></div> </blockquote></div><br></div> </div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div> </blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>