<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hi, Dave This is what I have been able to find regarding the GPLv3 motion. At today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting [1], we discussed the motion submitted by Sebastian Silva to finalize the transition from GPLv2 to GPLv3 for the Sugar core libraries (Sugar Activity developers are still free to choose whatever Libre license they prefer for their work.) See [2]. I second the motion and bring it to you in an email vote. Approve. Tony Anderson Approve. Sameer Approve. <div> </div> <div>BTW I'm worried about the fact that the Sugar-Web part (and so Sugarizer too) use the Apache 2.0 Licence. </div> <div>I'm not a specialist but what imply a Licence migration ?</div> <div> </div> <div> Lionel.</div> <div dir="ltr">+1 para GPLv3 motion</div> <div> <div class="gmail_signature"> ___________________ Lic. José Miguel García Montevideo - Uruguay</div> </div> Approved! <div> </div> <div>Claudia Today at 8:04PM (ET) would be the deadline for the GPLv3 motion. (May 13 @ 8:04PM ET) So this vote was 6 in favor and one abstention. Tony </div> </body> </html>