<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> I think motion A could be simplified: <meta charset="utf-8"> <span style="font-size:14.666666666666666px;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;" id="docs-internal-guid-39cd2fe5-c7b6-44e6-0101-7bbcc18c5f6b">The <span style="font-size:14.666666666666666px;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:underline;vertical-align:baseline;">Finance Manager shall be appointed by a majority vote of the Sugar Labs Oversight Board and may be either a non-voting officer or one of the current Oversight Board members. The Finance Manager will serve at the will of the Board and may be removed and replaced by a majority vote of the Board if necessary. to The Oversight Board shall appoint a member of Sugar Labs to serve in the office of Finance Manager at the will of the Board. The last two paragraphs can be deleted. The last paragraph is redundant given the Finance Manager serves at the will of the Board. The paragraph regarding remuneration is unnecessary since the Board can clearly make decisions about remuneration as needed (which is basically wha the paragraph says). I think Motion B is unnecessary. The procedure with regard to the Conservancy is already defined (and apparently not under our control). Add to Motion A: duties: 3. The Finance Manager is authorized to approve expenditures up to $100 Requests for expenditures will be presented to the Board by the Finance Manager for approval. Most of the rest is implicit in Motion A duties item 1. </body> </html>