<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 May 2016 at 13:53, Adam Holt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:holt@laptop.org" target="_blank">holt@laptop.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Personally I'd be in favor of splitting $500 GSoC payments between organization and mentors-in-need ($250 each) particularly those mentors in low-income countries (of those most demonstrably catalyzed by a $250 Honorarium) if such a consensus later emerges.</p>
<p dir="ltr"></p></blockquote></div>So, the motion failed, with 3 votes for, 1 vote against, and 4 abstains, and the funds will accrue into the general fund.
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">So in that case, I guess a motion to pay a $250 thank you fee to specifically named mentors when the funds are available might pass with votes for from Adam and the 3 votes for this motion. </div></div>