<div dir="ltr">On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Chris Leonard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com" target="_blank">cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Chris Leonard <<a href="mailto:cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com">cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Adam Holt <<a href="mailto:holt@laptop.org">holt@laptop.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> ...<br>
><br>
>> In other words that SL's effective payment to SFConservancy (for<br>
>> legal/financial/administrative service) is equal to 10% of all expenditures<br>
>> (outlays) each fiscal year, i.e. March 1st to end of February.<br>
>><br>
>> (But someone else can correct me if I'm wrong!)<br>
><br>
> I think you are wrong, but I am still looking for the proof. It is my<br>
> understanding that SFC takes 10% of incoming donations only, not a 10%<br>
> cut of all transactions (inbound and outbound).<br>
><br>
> That is what is described in their template Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://sfconservancy.org/docs/sponsorship-agreement-template.pdf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://sfconservancy.org/docs/sponsorship-agreement-template.pdf</a><br>
><br>
> "Fees.<br>
> The FIXME-SIGNATORIES agree to donate ten percent (10%) of the<br>
> Project's gross revenue (including, but not necessarily limited to,<br>
> all income and donations) to Conservancy for its general operations."<br>
><br>
> I'm looking for an executed copy of the current SugarLabs-SFC FSA to<br>
> confirm, unfortunately the wiki version looks at variance with the<br>
> template, but as a wiki page, it has no "official" status.<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/SFC_Fiscal_Agreement" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/SFC_Fiscal_Agreement</a><br>
><br>
> cjl<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>Adam,<br>
<br>
As SFC contact, could you please confirm that this 2012 version of the<br>
Amended FSA is the currently effective agreement?<br></blockquote><div> <br></div><div>There no reason to believe otherwise. This agreement is what stands unless you have information that nobody else has :-)<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Note, it shows the 10% cut of revenue, no transaction fees.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>10% of initial capital too? Sorry am traveling non-stop for the coming days, but someone should read the agreement (attached by CJL, Thanks!!) carefully please if they have time this weekend please.<br><br>Then if there are outstanding questions accumulating, I can collect those and communicate those questions to SFConservancy intermittently, if we as a community have done our own homework first, Thanks!<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
cjl<br>
</blockquote></div><br>--<br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Unsung Heroes of OLPC, interviewed live @ <a href="http://unleashkids.org" target="_blank">http://unleashkids.org</a> !</div></div>
</div></div>