<HTML><BODY><br><br><br>Wednesday, June 3, 2015 5:24 PM -06:00 from Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho@hotmail.com>:<br> <blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #0857A6;margin:10px;padding:0 0 0 10px;"><div><div><div><div><div dir="ltr">Criticism != Critical Thinking. This whole discussion is pointless! You are arguing about the current use of laptops that are as much as 8 years old. Yes, many of them, maybe even most of them, are still usable and in use. What other platform can say that? Tell me and I'll buy stock in the company.</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br>If I understand correctly, you are saying that Sugar is above reproach because so many people benefit because the XO's last so long and so many are still in use. Ironically, the issue being challenged is how Sugar Labs calculates and communicates how many people use Sugar.<br><br>Dan<br> <br></BODY></HTML>