<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
Hello,<br><br>Not meaning to get in the way of the motion but after reading the log and the back and forth, may I suggest <br>the following wording that I believe takes care of the legal, honors the concerns voiced, makes it more inviting, <br>and suggests an informal non-legal association. <br><br>Present:<br> "Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with Sugar Labs or the Software Freedom Conservancy."<br><br>Revised:<br>
"Sugar Labs Local Labs, although vital to the Sugar Labs community ecosystem, are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with Sugar Labs or the Software Freedom Conservancy."<br><br>Hope it may help move the process forward.<br><br>Best!<br>John Tierney<br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:13:26 -0400<br>> From: walter.bender@gmail.com<br>> To: holt@laptop.org; gerald.ardito@gmail.com; cjb@laptop.org<br>> CC: tony@sfconservancy.org; bkuhn@sfconservancy.org; iaep@lists.sugarlabs.org; slobs@lists.sugarlabs.org<br>> Subject: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Local Labs motion<br>> <br>> Buried in the meeting log [1] is a motion [5] to adopt three changes<br>> [2, 3, 4] to the Trademark [6] and Local Labs [7] pages in the wiki.<br>> The motion was seconded and we began a vote, but whereas it seemed to<br>> be a controversial decision, I though it prudent to ask those who were<br>> not able to attend today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting to also<br>> vote.<br>> <br>> So far,<br>> <br>> walter +1<br>> cjl +1<br>> <br>> icarito -1<br>> <br>> alsroot has not voted yet.<br>> <br>> cjb, canoeberry, and geralda were not present.<br>> <br>> Please respond to this email with your vote.<br>> <br>> Also, there was motion [8], not yet seconded, to ask Tony if he was OK<br>> with a change in the wording of [4]. There was not consensus on the<br>> wording, but there was consensus on asking for Tony's input.<br>> <br>> Tony, could you please chime in?<br>> <br>> thanks.<br>> <br>> -walter<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Walter Bender<br>> Sugar Labs<br>> http://www.sugarlabs.org<br>> <br>> <br>> [1] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10<br>> [2] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739410<br>> [3] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739421<br>> [4] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739445<br>> [5] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739570<br>> [6] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Trademark<br>> [7] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Local_Labs<br>> [8] http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10#i_2739707<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)<br>> IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org<br>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep<br></div> </div></body>
</html>