<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hi, We could not be there for the last meeting. Another meeting with SFC officials has been scheduled in 15 hours (Fri 2 Dec 15.00UTC on #sugar-meeting [*]) [*] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://chat.sugarlabs.org/">http://chat.sugarlabs.org/</a> Laura Vargas has posted two questions for SLOBs we can discuss at tomorrow's meeting: <div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-western"> [1] Existe un formato o procedimiento requerido para obtener status como proyecto "oficial" de la comunidad Sugar Labs? Leo la wiki, pero no me queda claro. Is there a procedure/documentation required in order to get status as an "official" Sugar Labs Project? I already read the wiki, couldn't figure it out. [2] Tienen los proyectos "oficiales" los beneficios y obligaciones establecidas del acuerdo con la Software Freedom Conservancy? Does SFC Fiscal Soponsorship benefits/obligations apply to sugar lab's "official" projects? This is in relation to your question. See you at the meeting! Sebastian </div> El 05/11/11 07:57, Aleksey Lim escribió: <blockquote cite="mid:20111105125739.GA2832@antilopa-gnu" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:00:31AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">We'll be meeting with the SFC's Bradley Kuhn and the Conservancy's new General Counsel, Tony Sebro, to discuss how the Conservancy-local labs model might be shaped and improved. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Would be useful if Peru Sugar Labs people, if I got it right, who raised related questions, will post here the summary of their vision how SL/SFC might be useful from their point of view. Would be especially useful if it will happen sometime before the meeting to let people read the summary and be prepared. </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>