Will books be in the same Sugar Activities Library? If not, where do kids go to get books to use in Read?<br><br>(+1 to Library rather then Portal)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Eben Eliason <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eben.eliason@gmail.com">eben.eliason@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Sean DALY <<a href="http://sdaly.be" target="_blank">sdaly.be</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> hmmm I like "Activity Library" too... "Activities Library" even<br>
> better... but let's think twice before we drop "Sugar" from it.<br>
><br>
> "sugar+activities" is already well-referenced, but I would like to see<br>
> result Nr.1 be the aslo section page.<br>
><br>
> Our strategy is star marketing on the Activities (this why we always<br>
> capitalize), and linking them to Sugar mentioning the collaboration<br>
> and view source benefits. The idea being that Activities are not<br>
> applets to be run under OSes for grownups, but part of what comes with<br>
> the platform which itself runs on different systems.<br>
><br>
> Perhaps we can refer to "Sugar Activities Library" outside our site,<br>
> and "Activities Library" within it? Except for the aslo page which I<br>
<br>
</div>Yeah, that's what I was suggesting, simply to keep internal references<br>
to it concise.<br>
<br>
Eben<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> do think should be titled "Sugar Activities Library" for the<br>
> aforementioned SEO reason.<br>
><br>
> Sean<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM, David Farning <<a href="mailto:dfarning@sugarlabs.org">dfarning@sugarlabs.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Gary C Martin <<a href="mailto:gary@garycmartin.com">gary@garycmartin.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> On 4 Apr 2009, at 03:25, Eben Eliason wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Frederick Grose <<a href="mailto:fgrose@gmail.com">fgrose@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>>> To me, Portal is the weak word in Sugar Activities Portal. Portal<br>
>>>>> doesn't<br>
>>>>> give the warm, learning, discovery place like the word Library.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> So I would propose Sugar Activities Library. A place to check out<br>
>>>>> activities and discovery what is free to learn.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> +1!<br>
>>>> Maybe just "Activity Library" (non-plural, and dropping Sugar unless<br>
>>>> discussing it outside the Sugar context)?<br>
>>><br>
>>> +1 Activity Library sounds good to me :-)<br>
>>><br>
>> That has a great sound to it.<br>
>><br>
>> david<br>
>><br>
>> Although in Wisconsin schools have started calling libraries IMLCs or<br>
>> Instructional Media Learning Centers:)<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Marketing mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org">Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div class="im">IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)<br>
</div><a href="mailto:IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org">IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Caroline Meeks<br>Solution Grove<br>Caroline@SolutionGrove.com<br><br>617-500-3488 - Office<br>505-213-3268 - Fax<br>