<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Edward Cherlin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:echerlin@gmail.com">echerlin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> The question is not what SL distributes. It is what SL enables. I<br> repeat my request for attention to managing this complex matrix. It at<br> least needs some organized attention on the Wiki. I don't mind who<br> hosts which repositories, as long as I can find them all in one place.<br> I don't care where you want your bugs reported, as long as I can find<br> them all in one place.</blockquote><div> </div><div>Not going to happen. The workflow is to "Report problems with distro packages to the distributor", ie launchpad/debbugs. Triagers there then look at those bugs, and consider whether they need to be forwarded upstream to SL. You'll be able to see all of the sugar-on-ubuntu bugs in one place, and all the sugar-on-gentoo bugs in another, but you aren't going to see them all in one place, since that's not the way distributions work.<br> <br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I do care how everything gets tested. I want a<br> bunch of VMs running regressions _every day_.<br> </blockquote><div><br>Please feel free to set that up, but we arn't building packages every day. <br><br></div></div>-- <br>Luke Faraone<br><a href="http://luke.faraone.cc">http://luke.faraone.cc</a><br>