In my opinion we  should use a customized trac for project management, i don't like to have too many resources to take into <br>count, we already have the necessary ones (Trac, mediawiki..moodle)<br><br>The Gantt plugin it's a good solution there.<br> <br><br clear="all">Rafael Ortiz <br> <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Sameer Verma <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sverma@sfsu.edu">sverma@sfsu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d">On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Bernie Innocenti <<a href="mailto:bernie@codewiz.org">bernie@codewiz.org</a>> wrote:<br> > Sameer Verma wrote:<br> >> dotProject (<a href="http://www.dotproject.net/" target="_blank">http://www.dotproject.net/</a>) and Project.net<br> >> (<a href="http://www.project.net/" target="_blank">http://www.project.net/</a>) are good candidates. They are both FOSS,<br> >> although I haven't had much luck locating Project.net's FOSS license.<br> >> Their Bus. Dev. guy tells me that the next release will be GPLv3.<br> ><br> > dotProject is marked as "other/proprietary license" on SourceForge.<br> ><br> <br> </div>Actually dotProject is under GPLv2<br> (<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/dotproject/" target="_blank">http://sourceforge.net/projects/dotproject/</a>), while Project.net is<br> marked Proprietary/other. Project.net is under "commercial open<br> source" license, whatever that means. I did not get a clear answer out<br> of their Business Dev VP. He kept talking in circles and finally said<br> that the next release was going to be GPLv3.<br> <div class="Ih2E3d"><br> > Redmine (<a href="http://www.redmine.org/" target="_blank">http://www.redmine.org/</a>) seemed like a promising clone of<br> > trac more oriented towards project management.<br> <br> </div>Yes, I remember Bryan Berry (OLE Nepal) mentioning it a while back.<br> <div class="Ih2E3d"><br> <br> > I proposed evaluating<br> > it some time ago, but the developers are too used to trac to consider<br> > switching.<br> <br> </div>Trac does have a Gantt module written in Python<br> (<a href="http://willbarton.com/code/tracgantt/" target="_blank">http://willbarton.com/code/tracgantt/</a>) and we looked at it a while<br> back for SF State. We use Trac for managing our iLearn (branded Moodle<br> install) system and wanted some PM charts such as Gantt. We found the<br> granularity provided by this module to be too large to be useful. It<br> tracks milestones instead of tickets.<br> <br> Maybe someone here could hack it to make it more suitable.<br> <br> cheers,<br> <div class="Ih2E3d">Sameer<br> <br> --<br> Dr. Sameer Verma, Ph.D.<br> Associate Professor of Information Systems<br> San Francisco State University<br> San Francisco CA 94132 USA<br> <a href="http://verma.sfsu.edu/" target="_blank">http://verma.sfsu.edu/</a><br> <a href="http://opensource.sfsu.edu/" target="_blank">http://opensource.sfsu.edu/</a><br> </div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)<br> <a href="mailto:IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org">IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br>