<br><tt><font size=2>Alan Kay <alan.nemo@yahoo.com> schrieb am 02.05.2008
15:33:50:</font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>> At the risk of trying to talk about education,
here is another </font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>> little essay with a few observations...</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>> </font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>> http://www.vpri.org/pdf/human_condition.pdf</font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Personally I think one of the most fundamental question
that is still waiting for an answer is: How are we going to teach 8-10
year old kids to become sysadmins?</font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Sugar is great and it is about to become a wonderful
environment to do any form of collaborative work. But it’s also one of
the most complex and challenging systems I have seen to date from a sysadmin
perspective.</font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Making it very, very hard to transition from the lovely
Sugar-Gui world too the harsh reality of Open Firmware boot prompts, Linux
kernel messages, SysV runtime levels, xorg.conf files, wifi standards and
Avahi multicasts announcements.</font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>So you could end up with a system that is wonderful
in teaching almost everything except computers. Because the only
thing kids will learn about computers is that sometimes they break, make
you feel like a complete idiot and that it's better not to change anything
too avoid feeling like being an idiot.</font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>This ultimately leads to a situation where you either
have to enable young kids to understand pretty complex and high level system
administration stuff or need one dedicated computer geek per school you
can offload any computer related problem within a school (which would be
the less ideal solution). </font></tt>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>cu andreas</font></tt>
<br>
<br>