[IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] yet another motion regarding Samson's travel

Lionel Laské lionel.laske at gmail.com
Sun Sep 24 16:33:37 EDT 2017


-1 for this motion.

Participation to the GSoC Summit is already a privilege. It's fair that
Samson as a mentor could have opportunity to attend to it.
I don't see any advantage for SugarLabs on the Samson side trip, so there
is no reason for SugarLabs to pay for it.

          Lionel.

2017-09-24 20:59 GMT+02:00 Samson Goddy <samsongoddy at gmail.com>:

>
>
> On Sep 24, 2017 7:44 PM, "Adam Holt" <holt at laptop.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> This is a timely matter, so please vote ASAP.
>>
>> regards.
>>
>> -walter
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Sameer Verma <sverma at sfsu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Second.
>>>
>>> Sameer
>>>
>>> On Sep 22, 2017 10:48 PM, "Walter Bender" <walter.bender at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As has been discussed, Samson would like to have a layover in Boston on
>>>> the way back from the Google Summer of Code summit. He has documented here
>>>> [1] that there is not increase in the cost of the ticket to make the Boston
>>>> stop. Nonetheless, the SFC has asked that the oversight board approve this
>>>> change in the original motion, which only mentioned the GSoC summit.
>>>>
>>>> Motion: approve the inclusion of a Boston layover in Samson's trip from
>>>> Nigeria to California on his return from the GSoC summit.
>>>>
>>>> Please note that this is independent of the request for additional
>>>> funding associated with traveling to Boston (although as Samson has already
>>>> noted, we have arranged free lodging for him, thanks to the Minsky family).
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dBJ14BeT4titV9FU7Cf0jcJc
>>>> 5nto54ly8aZEbN8ZbVw/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>
> This documentation is incorrect.  Sugar Labs is being asked to pay $487.36
> or $676.76 extra as a result of Samson Goddy's desired side-trips (which
> were not mention in Motion 2017-17
> <https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions>) to LA and
> Boston after GSoC Mentoring Summit in the SF area Oct 13-15.
>
> As compared to a Nigeria-San Francisco flight without such visits (
> $1433.46 is the actual total price at http://klm.com also shown at
> https://goo.gl/flights/XwKR )
>
> The links are not displaying. I chose a preferred flight to SFC which was
> under the rules and also flexible for me, i took weeks in getting that
> flights . Are you now choosing another flight for me?
>
> SFC originally asked me to Ask SLOBS for permission because they notice my
> layover in Boston which i explain in previous mail. That i am meeting with
> the scratch team and secondly walter about future T.A day in Nigeria.
>
> I am going to L.A from SFO on my own expenses  (caryl is paying for the
> flight) taking a local flight from L.A.X to boston.
>
> Which i did. You saying that document is incorrect is wrong. Because i
> sent the same documents to SFC starting that i am to fly British airways
> and coming back October 24th because of an exams i am having in Nigeria.
>
>
> Sugar Labs may indeed decide Samson's side trips are worth the extra
> price, be it either of the following of the 2 flights chosen by Samson:
>
> $487.36 = 1730.82 (pricier open-jaw ticket) + 190 (LA to Boston) - 1433.46
>
> $676.76 = 1920.22 (pricier open-jaw ticket) + 190 (LA to Boston) -1433.46
>
> Let's be open to an honest, civil debate here about how much exactly
> Samson's side trips are (or are not) worth to Sugar Labs.  Please if we can
> execute financial decision-making in public (I'm moving this private email
> discussion from slobs at lists.sugarlabs.org to iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org)
> unless there is an overwhelming reason for confidentiality during
> merger/acquisition planning, legal threats etc.
>
>
> It is cool, but i don't understand why the arguments. The google link
> shows the flight i chose and explain how i intend to go to Boston.
>
> Once again thank you.
>
> Please i am to meet with SFC on monday for my flight so making this
> decision fast will be nice.
>
>
> Thank You All.
>
> regards.
>>>>
>>>> -walter
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Walter Bender
>>>> Sugar Labs
>>>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>>>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SLOBs mailing list
>>>> SLOBs at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Walter Bender
>> Sugar Labs
>> http://www.sugarlabs.org
>> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SLOBs mailing list
>> SLOBs at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>>
>> --
>> <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs>
>> <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs>
>> Unsung Heroes of OLPC, interviewed live @
>> <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs>http://unleashkids.org !
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SLOBs mailing list
> SLOBs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20170924/5275ab0c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the IAEP mailing list