[IAEP] [SLOBS] [Sugar-devel] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon
Laura Vargas
laura at somosazucar.org
Fri Sep 15 16:39:30 EDT 2017
Walter, Adam,
Am confused here. Why did we not need a motion to make the question to Tony
in the first place?
Can you please clarify.
Procedure Note: In my opinion such legal related motions should be
translated to Sugar Labs main users language: Spanish. This takes time but
needs to be done so that real Sugar users can understand what the Oversight
is requesting.
Regards
2017-09-15 15:26 GMT-05:00 Martin Dengler <martin at martindengler.com>:
>
> > On 15 Sep 2017, at 14:13, Lionel Laské <lionel.laske at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1 for the motion.
> >
> > @Martin, thanks to wait for all votes or at least the end of voting
> delay.
>
> Sure Lionel - what is the voting delay? I actually was waiting but the
> wiki had been updated already (not by me) so I figured as the wiki had been
> updated and the outcome was not in doubt it was ok to summarize it in an
> email. I agree the delay should govern in the future.
>
> > Lionel.
>
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> SLOBs mailing list
> SLOBs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
--
Laura V.
* I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org*
“Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
~ L. Victoria
Happy Learning!
#LearningByDoing
#Projects4good
#IDesignATSugarLabs
#WeCanDoBetter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20170915/7097bf13/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the IAEP
mailing list