[IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion 2017-08-10: Sugar Labs Financial Manager to have a monthly compensation
James Cameron
quozl at laptop.org
Thu Aug 10 18:01:29 EDT 2017
What was the responsiveness of the SFC to that inquiry?
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 08:53:06AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> I disagree. While the quality of the reporting left much to be desired, the
> relative importance of this issue to our organization seems to be pretty minor.
> That said, if there was some assurance that a FM could somehow light a fire
> under the SFC regarding responsiveness to financial inquiries, e.g., Samson's
> request for a travel advance to procure his visa, then I would be all for it.
> But that seems to be a structural issue within the SFC, not within Sugar Labs.
>
> -walter
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Samson Goddy <[1]samsongoddy at sugarlabs.org>
> wrote:
>
> Yeah i totally agree...
>
> +1 Laura
>
> regards
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Laura Vargas <[2]laura at somosazucar.org>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi SLOB's and members all,
>
> I think we should learn from experience and start compensating doing
> all this work for Sugar Lab's Organization [keeping track of
> communications and transactions with the Software Freedom Conservancy].
>
>
> Motion: Sugar Labs Financial Manager will have a monthly compensation
> of US$ TBD in exchange for:
> 1 complete financial report per quarter and it's publication on the
> Sugar Labs Finance Wiki page maximum 30 calendar days after the end of
> the period. The format to be used should be compatible with the
> International Financial Reporting Standards* or it's equivalent in the
> U.S..
>
> *see [3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Financial_Report
> ing_Standards
>
> To approve the proposed motion simplifies the [4]July, 2016 SLOB's
> motion/decision, assigns a monthly compensation for the Financial
> Manager and above all, assures community has timely access to reports.
>
>
> I hope another SLOB can second the motion in order to start voting.
> Suggestions to define the value are also welcome from all, specially
> from Adam :D
>
> Below I pasted some extracts from background emailing about the subject
> in case anyone interested in reading.
>
>
> Regards and blessings,
>
> Laura V
>
>
> 2017-08-05 19:31 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho <[5]cbigenho at hotmail.com>:
>
>
> Hi All...
>
> There was (and still seems to be) a lot of confusion regarding the
> topic of a treasurer's report. I think the main problem is that
> most of you are thinking of the SugarLabs "Books" (a big ledger
> will all the personal identifying information Adam was referring
> to) instead of a simple "Treasurers Report" which just includes
> the pertinent information without all the identifying details. The
> former, the "books," should be available to the SLOBs on request on
> a view only basis as mentioned elsewhere in this thread. The
> latter, the Treasurer's Report, should be available to all Sugar
> Labs members and other interested parties as appropriate.
>
> Maybe it is all the years I have spent in many types of
> organizations (4H, Girl Scouts, homeowner's organizations,
> teacher's orgs, Sierra Club groups, etc.) that make this seem very
> familiar, simple, and straightforward. Hopefully the information
> below can help make it work well for Sugar Labs as well.
>
> A quick Google search turns up this list of criteria for a simple
> monthly treasurer's report. It says it should include:
>
> 1. the name of the organization.
> 2. the period which the report covers.
> 3. the cash balance at the beginning of the period.
> 4. the income received during the period (with sources)
> 5. the expenses paid during the period (with what it was for and
> who was paid ... name only, no PII).
> 6. the cash balance at the end of the period.
> 7. the signature of the treasurer.
> Another easy to follow resource is this description of how to put
> such a report together: [6] https://www.energizeinc.com/art/
> treasurers-report
>
> (Note: the sample they refer to in this is missing... you have to
> buy the book to see it!).
>
> Yesterday's financial report was very confusing and seeing Adam's
> email just seemed to make it worse. Maybe going forward we can
> simplify and we all will know what is happening. Oh, and by the
> way, there is no need to make the Income negative and the Expenses
> positive. This is for us, not the SFC.
>
> Caryl
>
> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
> From: IAEP <[7]iaep-bounces at lists.sugarlabs.org> on behalf of Tony
> Anderson <[8]tony_anderson at usa.net>
> Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 1:07:55 AM
> To: SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs
> Subject: [IAEP] Meeting August 4, 2017
>
>
> I am amazed at the discussion on finance.
>
> The governing bylaw is at [9] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/
> Oversight_Board/Decisions July 1, 2016.
>
> [10]Oversight Board/Decisions - Sugar Labs
> [11]wiki.sugarlabs.org
> This page (largely complete) is intended to be a one-stop place for
> reviewing all of the Sugar Labs oversight board (SLOB) actions and
> decisions.
>
> Our Finance Manager is Adam Holt. He must authorize every petty
> cash transaction (<$200) and the board must approve all other
> transactions.
>
> I am sure that in a given quarter, the number of approved
> transactions is less than a dozen.
>
> The quarterly report is the starting balance, transactions
> reporting receipts, transactions reporting expenses, and an ending
> balance.
>
> I suspect all of this could be could be recorded on fewer than a
> dozen 80 column punched cards. (About 10^-6 GB).
>
> Tony
>
>
> #WeCanDoBetter
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> [12]IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [13]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
> _______________________________________________
> SLOBs mailing list
> [14]SLOBs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [15]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> [16]http://www.sugarlabs.org
> [17]
>
> References:
>
> [1] mailto:samsongoddy at sugarlabs.org
> [2] mailto:laura at somosazucar.org
> [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Financial_Reporting_Standards
> [4] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions
> [5] mailto:cbigenho at hotmail.com
> [6] https://www.energizeinc.com/art/treasurers-report
> [7] mailto:iaep-bounces at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [8] mailto:tony_anderson at usa.net
> [9] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions
> [10] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions
> [11] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/
> [12] mailto:IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [13] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> [14] mailto:SLOBs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> [15] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs
> [16] http://www.sugarlabs.org/
> [17] http://www.sugarlabs.org/
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
More information about the IAEP
mailing list