[IAEP] IAEP Digest, Vol 99, Issue 115

[Tony Anderson]

Dave,

AFIK, it is true. Do you have any reference to show that the Sugar Labs 
Board has any different bylaws? I am new to the Board
and so at some historical point, the normal rules of order could have 
been changed.

The motion was not made by Sebastian, but by Walter. I think you need to 
re-read the log of the meeting. Non-members of the Board are welcome to 
propose actions by the Board, but Board members must take the action, if 
they so chose.

The vote by 'private thread' is not a Benghazi conspiracy theory. There 
is no one on the Board who is conspriing to keep secrets from the 
membership.
I really think your persistence in accusing the Board of conspiracy is 
out of line.

Tony

On 06/30/2016 06:33 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 30 June 2016 at 12:07, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net> wrote:
>> I posted no motion on June 4.
>> ...
>> Making a comment is not a motion.
> My apologies; you drafted it and I posted it in thread "Motion: to
> undertake a fund raising drive." and it was not seconded.
>
>> According to standard rules of order, a motion must be 'moved' by
>> a member of the Board.
> As far as I know, this is false.
>
> Here is a copy of my earlier email which you did not respond to in your reply:
>
> --- 8< ---
>
> In http://www.mail-archive.com/iaep%40lists.sugarlabs.org/msg16403.html
> Walter notes that
>
> (a) the GPL motion - **which you voted to approve** - was submitted
>
> (i) by email, and
>
> (ii) by Sebastian, not a SLOB member, and
>
> (b) it was voted on in a private thread on the SLOBs list, which
> Walter regretfully informs us he forgot to CC to the lists.
>
> --- 8< ---
>
> I would like you to comment on these 4 points :)
> .
>