[IAEP] [SLOBS] Motion: to consider email votes on motions only valid if they are sent to both the SLOBs and IAEP mailing lists.

[Dave Crossland]

On 21 June 2016 at 11:56, Sean DALY <sdaly.be at gmail.com> wrote:
> an agreed upon partnership placed under publication embargo. SL wouldn't
> likely need to embargo, but a partner might wish to. This PR-smart approach
> has been transformed by the Internet and social media these past few years,
> but

Similarly, what does that have to do with public motions?

If the board wants to act in private, they don't need to vote on
public motions to do so.