[IAEP] Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a, member

[Tony Anderson]

Sebastian,

Please identify a motion proposed by a member which has not been 
considered.

Naturally, consideration of a proposal is not necessarily approval.

Tony

On 06/04/2016 06:00 PM, iaep-request at lists.sugarlabs.org wrote:
> Send IAEP mailing list submissions to
> 	iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	iaep-request at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	iaep-owner at lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of IAEP digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member
>        (Sebastian Silva)
>     2. Re: Sugar/OLPC Relations (Dave Crossland)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 10:39:39 -0500
> From: Sebastian Silva <sebastian at fuentelibre.org>
> To: Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com>, SLOBs <slobs at lists.sugarlabs.org>,
> 	iaep <iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [IAEP] Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a
> 	member
> Message-ID: <9ff0e258-8e0b-9a0e-f375-f038172b8549 at fuentelibre.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I too would support this motion. If people want to be SLOBs they should
> consider community proposals not just their own ideas.
>
>
> El 03/06/16 a las 17:59, Dave Crossland escribió:
>> Motion: to vote on each motion proposed by a member, dropping the
>> current practice of requiring a seconding before moving to a vote.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20160604/95917160/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 09:53:36 -0600
> From: Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com>
> To: Samuel Greenfeld <samuel at greenfeld.org>
> Cc: IAEP SugarLabs <iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [IAEP] Sugar/OLPC Relations
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAEozd0wvtFEF68PkNOZhVkLGLUsNvbEw_KEJ_r99xTcybutVJQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 4 June 2016 at 09:35, Samuel Greenfeld <samuel at greenfeld.org> wrote:
>
>> when I was discussing this with Peter a while back
>
> Peter who? :)
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20160604/b4f3b355/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of IAEP Digest, Vol 99, Issue 20
> ************************************