[IAEP] Revision 50 of the Sugar Labs Fundraising Committe notes

[Laura Vargas]

Hi Dave,

"Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it
universally accessible and useful."

This can be done with 100% free/libre software: no conflict with SL active
members values.

Regards,
Laura V

2016-07-16 10:56 GMT-05:00 Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com>:

>
> Hi Laura
>
> I'd like to follow up on this thread :)
>
> On 15 July 2016 at 23:39, Laura Vargas <laura at somosazucar.org> wrote:
>
>> - Microsoft (laura -1: No private software funds shall get into our
>> accounts!) (dave +1: money is money, and almost all the funding sources
>> are private companies; the Nadella Microsoft is very different to the
>> Gates/Ballmer era and is about as ethical as Google, Facebook, Intel, or
>> IBM :) (Laura: don't apply, the requirement from grants providers to
>> resonate SL values is not negotiable as it stands for the whole learning
>> model we are proposing.) (Sean -1: No point adding Microsoft or Bill &
>> Melinda Gates Foundation to this list.) (Dave: You assert your own
>> values as "SL values", but the observable behaviour of SL and OLPC is not
>> consistent with them. What do you see as the difference between Google and
>> Microsoft? Why does SL take Google's money?)
>
>
> How does Google resonate with SL values more than Microsoft?
>
> Cheers
> Dave
>



-- 
Laura V.
I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org
Happy Learning!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20160718/f29c24ec/attachment.html>