[IAEP] Is "Most Sugar Users Use XO Laptops" True?

[Dave Crossland]

Hi

On 24 April 2016 at 00:04, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com> wrote:

> OLPC does share a table of the SKUs manufactured that contains some
> information about where they are going.
>
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Manufacturing_data
>
> Far from perfect for your purpose, but is is a start.
>

AWESOME :D


> Are you talking about a driver on the XO-4 or something
>

Yes, I'm referring to software required to make the hardware work.
Distinguishing between firmware, drivers, operating systems, libraries,
programs, and scripts doesn't seem important to me when considering the
question of if a program is libre licensed or not.


> IANAL, so I'm not touching "Sugar isn't actually GPL", but if there are
> serious concerns about our licensing, please document them so others can
> look into it.
>

No concern at all! Just a statement of fact - as I understand it. Which is
that Sugar is LGPL, and OLPC made Sugar LGPL to allow proprietary Sugar
Activities. Is this incorrect?

-- 
Cheers
Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20160424/5c10e0e9/attachment.html>