[IAEP] Sugar 0.100 or 1.0

[Daniel Narvaez]

It seems like we have agreement on going 1.0 so far. Unless someone speak
up I'm going to make that the plan in a couple of days.


On 17 May 2013 15:07, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> we need to decide if we want the next release to be 1.0 or 0.100.
>
> Here is the features we are planning for it.
>
> * Develop an HTML5 based toolkit for activities
>
> * Multiple selection in the Journal
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection
>
> * Enhanced support for 3G modems
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support
>
> * Background customization
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Background_image_on_home_view
>
> * Multiple home views
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multiple_home_views
>
> * Integration with web services
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Web_services
>
> * Journal comments box
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Comment_box_in_journal_detail_view
>
> * Icon customization
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change
>
>
> It's a bit of weird situation because code wise we are not really 1.0
> ready. We are developing a new toolkit and the old one could use an API
> cleanup. On the other hand we are deployed to millions of users.
>
> Personally I don't really have a strong feeling. If the marketing team
> sees an opportunity in a 1.0 in October with the above feature list I'd say
> to go ahead with it even if from a developer point of view we are not
> ready. Otherwise we could delay it at least another cycle.
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>



-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20130517/1af98e88/attachment.html>