[IAEP] [SLOBS] Local Labs motion

[Chris Ball]

Hi,

I'm sorry I wasn't there; it conflicted with OLPC's weekly engineering
meeting.  I should be able to make the next meeting.

Responding in reverse order:

On Wed, May 30 2012, Walter Bender wrote:
> Also, there was motion [8], not yet seconded, to ask Tony if he was OK
> with a change in the wording of [4]. There was not consensus on the
> wording, but there was consensus on asking for Tony's input.

I don't think this needs to be voted on -- we can talk to Tony without
voting to decide to talk to Tony.  Let's do that.

> Buried in the meeting log [1] is a motion [5] to adopt three changes
> [2, 3, 4] to the Trademark [6] and Local Labs [7] pages in the wiki.
> The motion was seconded and we began a vote, but whereas it seemed to
> be a controversial decision, I though it prudent to ask those who were
> not able to attend today's Sugar Labs oversight board meeting to also
> vote.
>
> So far,
>
> walter +1
> cjl +1
>
> icarito -1
>
> alsroot has not voted yet.
>
> cjb, canoeberry, and geralda were not present.
>
> Please respond to this email with your vote.

Since we'd like to consider revising the third statement, I'll vote -1
on this motion -- my impression is that we don't all consider the
proposed wording ready to be decided on, which is a good reason not
to adopt it yet.

(Voting this way now doesn't mean I'd definitely vote this way again
on the same text in the future; it's because we're still looking into
revising the text, not because I find the change unacceptable.)

Thanks!

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb at laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child