[IAEP] In-person SLOBs meeting notes (+my votes)

[Mel Chua]

Thanks for taking notes on the SLOBs meeting in-person, folks!

http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2011-05-08T19:25:35.html

MOTION: A slob (to start with, Bernie) is authorized to approve spending 
tickets filed on the bugtracker up to $200.  For amounts larger than 
this, we still need a full SLOBs motion.

+1 from me, making this a +7 SLOBs unanimous vote. (Please keep 
reporting the under-$200 spends to iaep, please, for transparency!)

MOTION: We will have a Non-binding referendum of the community regarding 
whether Sugar Labs should recommend distributing Sugar modules under the 
GPLv3 or later (instead of the previous GPLv2 or later), with individual 
developers being responsible for deciding whether to update the license 
of the modules that they maintain.

+1 from me, making this a +6 SLOBs vote (icarito absent from the room)

MOTION: Patch for our Governance page to bring it in line with what 
we're actually doing: http://fpaste.org/JfrD/

+1 from me, making this a +6 SLOBs vote (icarito absent from the room)

--Mel