[IAEP] Reunión sober auspicio fiscal SFC - Sugar Labs / Local Labs (was: Re: [somos-azucar] [SLOBS] meeting announcement)

[Sebastian Silva]

Hi,
We could not be there for the last meeting. Another meeting with SFC 
officials
has been scheduled in 15 hours (Fri 2 Dec 15.00UTC on #sugar-meeting [*])
[*] http://chat.sugarlabs.org/

Laura Vargas has posted two questions for SLOBs we can discuss at 
tomorrow's
meeting:

/[1] Existe un formato o procedimiento requerido
para obtener status como proyecto "oficial" de la
comunidad Sugar Labs? Leo la wiki, pero no me
queda claro.

Is there a procedure/documentation required in
order to get status as an "official" Sugar Labs
Project? I already read the wiki, couldn't figure
it out.

[2] Tienen los proyectos "oficiales" los beneficios
y obligaciones establecidas del acuerdo con la
Software Freedom Conservancy?

Does SFC Fiscal Soponsorship benefits/obligations
apply to sugar lab's "official" projects?
/
This is in relation to your question.
See you at the meeting!

Sebastian

El 05/11/11 07:57, Aleksey Lim escribió:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:00:31AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
>> We'll be meeting with the SFC's Bradley Kuhn and the Conservancy's new
>> General Counsel, Tony Sebro, to discuss how the Conservancy-local labs
>> model might be shaped and improved.
> Would be useful if Peru Sugar Labs people, if I got it right, who
> raised related questions, will post here the summary of their vision
> how SL/SFC might be useful from their point of view.
>
> Would be especially useful if it will happen sometime before the meeting
> to let people read the summary and be prepared.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20111201/220bef97/attachment.html>