[IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] GPL non compliance? was Re: GPL non-compliance, was Re: GPLv3
dr at jones.dk
Tue Apr 26 16:16:06 EDT 2011
On 11-04-26 at 03:37pm, John Watlington wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > How is that a violation of GPL license?
> > I believe they do have full access to all source code - just is not
> > allowed to execute it (conveniently) on the hardware it resides on.
> Walter is correct that kids in Uruguay should be able to modify Sugar
> and install additional activities and apps, even though they may not
> have root access or a developer key.
I fully agree that kids anywhere should be able to modify Sugar.
The issue here, however, is whether or not it is a violation of Sugar
license if someone restricts kids from modifying Sugar *on* *XOs*.
> > Tivoization - as I understand it - is when the hardware locks the
> > code in a way so that it can be executed but sources for the
> > executed code is not available. That, I believe, is not the case
> > for GPL-licensed code on the XOs even when the XOs are locked down.
> > GPL code must be _readable_ - it need not be executable.
> Actually, I believe that GPL v3 "fixed" that oversight.
How, more specifically?
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the IAEP