[IAEP] [SLOBS] GPL non compliance? was Re: [Sugar-devel] GPL non-compliance, was Re: GPLv3

[Sebastian Silva]

 From the olpc-uruguay list in an unrelated thread:

"Si utilizamos las claves de desarrollador (que son las que permiten 
hacer cualquier cosa en la maquina), pero al momento solo se entregan 
por solicitudes puntuales (proyectos de grado por ejemplo)." - Ing. 
Daniel Castelo - Plan Ceibal - Área Técnica
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/olpc-uruguay/2011-April/005222.html
Rough translation:
/"We do use developer keys (the ones that allow you to do anything with 
the machine), but at the moment they are only given for specific 
requests (like for example thesis projects)." - Eng Daniel Castelo - 
Plan Ceibal - Technical Area
/

I know its not official but its a pretty clear indication that developer 
keys are not available to everyone.
This makes Yama's concerns valid and important, I think.
Since the board will probably meet in UY next month, this should be an 
item in our agenda.

Sebastian


El 23/04/11 13:49, Yamandu Ploskonka escribió:
> following Martin's timely advice, may I please try again, so we can 
> finish this with simple answers?
>
> the question is (or are)
>
>    1. is locking users out in compliance with current GPL?
>    2. does Ceibal lock out users?
>    3. is there a known procedure to get keys for Ceibal users?
>    4. is Ceibal in compliance with current GPL?
>    5. if no, who should follow up? the FSF? the Sugarlabs Board?
>    6. were of-record (2, 3) Ceibal policies to continue, would it be
>       in compliance with GPL3?
>    7. if no, who should follow up? the FSF? the Sugarlabs Board?
>
> I know that 2 and 3 are almost rhetorical, but in the interest of not 
> building other questions as "loaded", I add them there.  There even 
> might be good news I am unaware of that someone who is better informed 
> can offer!
>
> Thank you
>
> Yama
>
>
> On 04/23/2011 01:16 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Folks --
>>
>> one thing we need to be in good intellectual shape to handle loaded
>> questions. Everyone here probably knows them well, but I just re-read
>>
>>     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
>>
>> and it was rather refreshing and useful.
>>
>> In general, if you don't know much about a topic, it is a good idea to
>> *avoid* making inflammatory statements and accusations.
>>
>> You can ask, but please don't mix the valid questions with accusations
>> or loaded questions. It doesn't help anyone.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>>
>> m
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SLOBs mailing list
> SLOBs at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20110423/c1e78dd2/attachment.html>