[IAEP] Etoys, is it difficult or easy?

[Alan Kay]

Hi Gerald,

Yes, I think the "experts" approach is a good one also -- we first saw it used 
by Betty Edwards (the drawing teacher) and it works very well if the ratio is 
about 1 expert to 6 or 7 learners or better.

And we have tried this with Etoys (mostly on adult teachers).

However, of all the ways we've tried, doing one on ones, and then using the new 
learners as one on one teachers for the next group (so you are doubling each 
time) works the best (and is also the most efficient with regard to how much 
time it takes to successfully do the first Etoys exercise -- in which the 
learners do and learn about 35 things in about 30 minutes).

Best regards,

Alan




________________________________
From: Dr. Gerald Ardito <gerald.ardito at gmail.com>
To: Alan Kay <alan.nemo at yahoo.com>
Cc: Caroline Meeks <caroline at solutiongrove.com>; Cherry Withers 
<cwithers at ekindling.org>; danielgastelu at yahoo.com.ar; Tim McNamara 
<paperless at timmcnamara.co.nz>; Steve Thomas <stevesargon at gmail.com>; iaep 
<iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org>
Sent: Mon, September 27, 2010 4:31:13 PM
Subject: Re: [IAEP] Etoys, is it difficult or easy?

Alan,

First, I just want to clarify that I meant "challenged" in a positive way. The 
5th graders dove into Etoys first through painting, and then through scripting. 
However, I agree with what you say about artifacts of a pedagogical approach. We 
saw this, too.

Our learning situation involved 4-6 student "experts" with whom I spent time 
showing them the key elements of Etoys needed to begin the project. Then, when 
we introduced this project to larger class, these "experts" were free to move 
around the room helping other students.

We found this model to be a good one for generating a very productive classroom 
environment with the XOs (in fact, it was the topic of my dissertation which I 
completed last May). However, I wished we had spent more time with the scripting 
piece. We had not developed those skills enough.

Thanks.
Gerald


On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Alan Kay <alan.nemo at yahoo.com> wrote:

I'd be curious to hear what the process is with the 5th graders. These were our 
main subjects. We worked only through regular classroom teachers (who had been 
carefully coached). You will not see any "challenged" 5th graders if you use a 
one on one session with them for about 20-30 minutes. The best way to do this is 
to teach a few this way, and then use "a spreading wave" of one on ones. We 
found that this was much better with both children and adults than to try to 
teach all of them in mass.
>
>So you might be seeing artifacts of pedagogical approach here (and a lot of 
>"challenged" students result from such artifacts).
>
>Cheers,
>
>Alan
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Dr. Gerald Ardito <gerald.ardito at gmail.com>
>To: Caroline Meeks <caroline at solutiongrove.com>
>Cc: Cherry Withers <cwithers at ekindling.org>; danielgastelu at yahoo.com.ar; Tim 
>McNamara <paperless at timmcnamara.co.nz>; Steve Thomas <stevesargon at gmail.com>; 
>iaep <iaep at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>Sent: Mon, September 27, 2010 2:29:57 PM
>
>Subject: Re: [IAEP] Etoys, is it difficult or easy?
>
>
>Caroline,
>
>You are remembering well. And I agree with your hypothesis.
>
>The 5th graders took pretty well to Etoys. It is the drawing piece that hooks 
>them, and then the scripting part that really challenges them. And the 7th and 
>8th graders love Scratch. It is interesting to me because they also do plenty of 
>"painting" of sprites and backgrounds, but something about the bricks seems to 
>match their thinking process.
>
>I am getting ready to introduce my current 7th grade classes to Scratch and am 
>looking forward to that.
>
>Thanks.
>Gerald
>
>
>On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Caroline Meeks <caroline at solutiongrove.com> 
>wrote:
>
>Gerald did some interesting work last year introducing both Scratch and eToys to 
>5th and 8th graders.
>>
>>
>>Gerald please correct me if I am misremembering.
>>
>>
>>I think the results were the 8th graders took to Scratch more and the 5th 
>>graders took to eToys more.
>>
>>
>>Our hypothesis is that the first thing you do with eToys in draw and that is 
>>very accessible to 5th graders. They can engage with the system before they have 
>>to start understanding programming. 
>>
>>
>>On the other hand 8th graders were directly ready to engage with programming and 
>>had a easier/faster time picking that up with Scratch.
>>
>>
>>This is very much a hypothesis, not proven and not based on much data but it 
>>would be interesting to explore further.
>>
>>
>>On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Edward Cherlin <echerlin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>OK, I'll send it to you separately. Anybody else is still welcome to join in.
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 20:47, Steve Thomas <stevesargon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Edward,
>>>> Thanks, please send me the outline and what you think needs to be more
>>>> "easily discoverable" and I will work on it.
>>>> Stephen
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Edward Cherlin <echerlin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is true that you can do all of these things in EToys, if you know
>>>>> where to start. It is also true that the start screen of EToys could
>>>>> be improved by providing a path to each of them, and to other
>>>>> education modules, and Etoys could be improved with a few more
>>>>> introductory modules.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since children and untrained teachers cannot be expected to discover
>>>>> these paths, and paths in other Activities, on their own, I am in the
>>>>> middle of writing a guide to Discovery on the XO. The starting point
>>>>> is my Wiki page,
>>>>>
>>>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/The_Undiscoverable
>>>>>
>>>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick
>>>>> The undiscoverable  is an unofficial FAQ for tips, tricks, and
>>>>> solutions to common problems that may otherwise be tricky to find.
>>>>> These are being considered for inclusion in the official SoaS
>>>>> documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Etoys section needs vast expansion. I have an outline in mind,
>>>>> which I can share with anybody who would like to work on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 15:59, Tim McNamara <paperless at timmcnamara.co.nz>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > The analogy doesn't quite fit, as it's possible to do complex things in
>>>>> > all
>>>>> > of those tools and it's easy to do simple things in EToys. Each Activity
>>>>> > can
>>>>> > be used in this learning model, e.g. training wheels to motorbike.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Tim
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 25 September 2010 05:48, Cherry Withers <cwithers at ekindling.org>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> And Scratch? ... don't remember where I read it,  but it sounded
>>>>> >> logical
>>>>> >> to me.
>>>>> >> Use progressively difficult tools for progressively difficult tasks.
>>>>> >> To confirm this statement,  I add the phrase: "Visible learning,
>>>>> >> invisible
>>>>> >> technology".
>>>>> >> Children would first learn TurtleArt.
>>>>> >> When they outgrow it switch to Scratch.
>>>>> >> When all its possibilities are exhausted, continue with eToys.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>>> > IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Edward Mokurai (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) Cherlin
>>>>> Silent Thunder is my name, and Children are my nation.
>>>>> The Cosmos is my dwelling place, the Truth my destination.
>>>>> http://www.earthtreasury.org/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>>> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>Edward Mokurai (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) Cherlin
>>>Silent Thunder is my name, and Children are my nation.
>>>The Cosmos is my dwelling place, the Truth my destination.
>>>http://www.earthtreasury.org/
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>>IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>Caroline Meeks
>>Solution Grove
>>Caroline at SolutionGrove.com
>>
>>617-500-3488 - Office
>>505-213-3268 - Fax
>>
>
>



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20100927/0c4de96d/attachment.htm