[IAEP] deployment meeting agenda

[Raul Gutierrez Segales]

On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:36 -0400, Holt wrote:
> 18UTC does not work well given this collides exactly with the 2PM
> start of our "deployment" summit in the US Virgin Islands:
> 
>     http://realness.org/schedule/
> 
> Can we make it a few hours earlier?

Sorry about that, maybe we could switch the date.. Let me check
with .PE, .UY and .AR (haven't contact them privately, yet). 

Raúl 


> Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: 
> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:00 -0400, Anurag Goel wrote:
> >   
> > > May 28th sounds good. Are we set on a time yet?
> > >     
> > 
> > Would 18 UTC work?
> > 
> > 
> > Raúl 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > > I would like to have a few of my team members present at the meeting
> > > to share information/plans about our SoaS deployment in Delhi, India
> > > this summer. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Anurag 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Raul Gutierrez Segales
> > > <rgs at rieder.net.py> wrote:
> > >         Tomeu,
> > >         
> > >         On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 18:46 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > >         > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:37, Raul Gutierrez Segales
> > >         <rgs at rieder.net.py> wrote:
> > >         > > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:38 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> > >         > >> I made a first pass at a process on the team page:
> > >         > >>
> > >         > >>
> > >         http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team#How_to_add_topics
> > >         > >>
> > >         > >
> > >         > > So far we've got:
> > >         > >
> > >         > >     1. Migration to Sugar 0.88
> > >         > >     2. Deployments Concerns
> > >         > >     3. How to integrate better deployments and upstream
> > >         work ?
> > >         > >
> > >         > >
> > >         > > For a first meeting that might be good enough.. I guess
> > >         people usually
> > >         > > have 1-2 hours for such meetings. Something I've been
> > >         wanting to discuss
> > >         > > with Deployment for a while is good practices with School
> > >         Servers
> > >         > > management. Martin and Daniel have been discussing this
> > >         recently in
> > >         > > server-devel.. but I'd like to know more about
> > >         deployments.
> > >         > >
> > >         > > But maybe we are better off leaving for a 2nd meeting?
> > >         >
> > >         > My initial thinking was that the first meeting would be
> > >         about the team
> > >         > itself, so we set up the base for the actual work that will
> > >         happen
> > >         > onwards. Specifically, topics such as updating the mission
> > >         statement,
> > >         > the member list, checking the TODO list is updated, setting
> > >         some goals
> > >         > for the next months, discussing how to reach the deployments
> > >         that
> > >         > inevitably will be out of touch, etc.
> > >         >
> > >         
> > >         
> > >         Makes much more sense... If at least we can get most of the
> > >         deployments
> > >         into the meeting and we can start to build conscience of
> > >         working
> > >         together it would be a great start!
> > >         
> > >         > But as you said, meeting time is limited, so maybe we can do
> > >         those on
> > >         > the mailing list?
> > >         >
> > >         
> > >         
> > >         +1
> > >         
> > >         Cheers,
> > >         Raúl
> > >         
> > >         
> > >         
> > >         > Thanks a lot for leading this effort, Raul!
> > >         >
> > >         > Regards,
> > >         >
> > >         > Tomeu
> > >         >
> > >         > > Raúl
> > >         > >
> > >         > >
> > >         > >> -walter
> > >         > >>
> > >         > >> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Walter Bender
> > >         <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >         > >> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Tomeu Vizoso
> > >         <tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
> > >         > >> >> Hi,
> > >         > >> >>
> > >         > >> >> how do we propose topics for the next meeting? The
> > >         wiki is a bit
> > >         > >> >> ambiguous on this:
> > >         > >> >>
> > >         > >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Meetings
> > >         > >> >
> > >         > >> > I'd suggest we do something along the lines of what we
> > >         do for the
> > >         > >> > oversight-board meetings: simply let people add topic
> > >         suggestions to
> > >         > >> > the wiki and have the team then decide which will be
> > >         discussed at the
> > >         > >> > meeting.
> > >         > >> >
> > >         > >> > -walter
> > >         > >> >
> > >         > >> >> Regards,
> > >         > >> >>
> > >         > >> >> Tomeu
> > >         > >> >> _______________________________________________
> > >         > >> >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop
> > >         project!)
> > >         > >> >> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > >         > >> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> > >         > >> >>
> > >         > >> >
> > >         > >> >
> > >         > >> >
> > >         > >> > --
> > >         > >> > Walter Bender
> > >         > >> > Sugar Labs
> > >         > >> > http://www.sugarlabs.org
> > >         > >> >
> > >         > >>
> > >         > >>
> > >         > >>
> > >         > >
> > >         > >
> > >         > >
> > >         >
> > >         
> > >         
> > >         _______________________________________________
> > >         IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> > >         IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > >         http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Anurag Goel
> > > 
> > >     
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> > IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep