No subject

just not listening to people who offer contrary opinions.  This is
better than flaming them, but maybe not as good as it could be.

For an end-of-year report, I'd like to see instances enumerated where
SugarLabs actually internalized some outside critique and responded in
a positive way -- some concrete change made to the UI, or Sugar, or to
process.  That would be more convincing that simply stating, "we are
now open to critique".

> We're definitely intimidating to non-technical people. At least, this is
> what I sensed at the Realness Summit. OLE also seems to be doing a
> better job at connecting with educators. I'm not completely sure what
> corrective actions should be. We might need to do some work on the wiki,
> maybe add web forums, which non-geeks tend to prefer...

I suspect that the answer to this problem does not involve installing
additional software.
  --scott

--=20
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 ( http://cscott.net/ )