[IAEP] SoaS change of direction: heads-up on convos in other lists

[Martin Langhoff]

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Sean DALY <sdaly.be at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The problem with this approach is that it renders SoaS ineffective for
>> new tryers of Sugar (i.e. the overwhelming majority of teachers and
>> parents we are trying to reach).
>
> I don't think it will be any less ineffective than having 20
> activities of which half have issues, crash or just don't run.

Are people saying _only 6 activities work reliably?_

My question of "which is it?" was assuming there are more than 6 that
run well, demo well, maintained, etc. So it meant "which plan is it, 6
activities that allow downloading and installing of more, or the good
ones?"

If there are only 6 good ones...  would focus on making that list longer.

Did APIs break with Sugar churn, Fedora churn? Developers upload
without testing? (Rethorical! Flamefest warning! Those questions are
bound to be a flamefest blaming people who don't deserve to be
blamed... :-( )

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff at gmail.com
 martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff