[IAEP] Why #sugar should be logged - a plug for transparency and ease of use.
jeff at elkner.net
Tue Jan 12 21:25:22 EST 2010
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Dave Bauer <dave.bauer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Apparenly it was discussed. Some people do not like publicly available logs.
> I log all my IRC channels locally. This is handy because I can use desktop
> search to find something. I can't point someone else to them, but I suppose
> I could email part of it to someone.
I'm glad logging locally works for you, Dave, but it doesn't work for
me. I really need less things to do, not more ;-)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Luke Faraone <luke at faraone.cc> wrote:
>> Is there a good reason why we don't auto log the channel?
> We've talked this subject practically to death.
> See http://email@example.com/msg06656.html.
> (hint: the thread you want is here)
> Consensus has been "no" for a variety of reasons, which would be redundant
> to enumerate here once again.
> We already log meetings in #sugar-meeting, but the policy for #sugar is
> against it.
Can I just use #sugar-meeting, then, instead of #sugar? That would work for me.
More information about the IAEP